Usage Score
27.4
Player Dossier
2014-2016Utah State
JoJo Natson
WR • 5'7" • Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
JoJo Natson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
88.6
Consistency
62.3
Season Value
67.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Akron
141416
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Utah State • Akron
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UNLV
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
JoJo Natson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Akron. JoJo Natson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Akron paired 837 primary output with 88.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 88.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Utah State, Akron.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Marshall
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Akron
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
69.8
Efficiency
88.6
Usage
27.4
Consistency
62.3
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 90. Wisconsin: 44. Marshall: 134. App State: 87. Kent State: 48. Miami (OH): 81. Western Michigan: 46. Ball State: 109. Buffalo: 53. Toledo: 44. Bowling Green: 56. Ohio: 45
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 4 by 100. Wisconsin: 3 by 97.8. Marshall: 7 by 100. App State: 10 by 58. Kent State: 2 by 100. Miami (OH): 7 by 77.1. Western Michigan: 5 by 61.3. Ball State: 7 by 100. Buffalo: 5 by 70.7. Toledo: 3 by 97.8. Bowling Green: 3 by 100. Ohio: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins93 · n=4 · +39.4 vs Losses
Losses53.6 · n=7 · -39.4 vs Wins
First Half80.7 · n=6 · +21.8 vs Second Half
Second Half58.8 · n=6 · -21.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Marshall
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ohio
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 11/23 | @ Ohio | L 3-9 | — | 3 | 45 | 9.3 | 15 | 0 | 47 |
| Thu 11/10 | vs Bowling Green | L 28-38 | — | 3 | 56 | 18.7 | 18.70 | 0 | 50 |
| Wed 11/2 | vs Toledo | L 17-48 | — | 3 | 44 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 1 | 27 |
| Thu 10/27 | @ Buffalo | L 20-41 | — | 5 | 53 | 11 | 10.60 | 1 | 33 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Ball State100 receiving yards | W 35-25 | — | 7 | 109 | 15.6 | 15.60 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Western Michigan | L 0-41 | — | 5 | 46 | 9.2 | 9.20 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Miami (OH)2+ TD | W 35-13 | — | 7 | 81 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 2 | 32 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Kent State | W 31-27 | — | 2 | 48 | 17 | 24 | 0 | 43 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs App StateHigh volume | L 38-45 | — | 10 | 87 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Marshall100 receiving yards | W 65-38 | — | 7 | 134 | 16.5 | 19.10 | 1 | 43 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Wisconsin | L 10-54 | — | 3 | 44 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | — | 4 | 90 | 22.5 | 22.50 | 3 | 46 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Utah State
2014
Opening stop
- 2
Akron
2016
Final stop
Season Progression
201420142016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Postseason | Utah State | 504 | 58.8 | 24.2 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Utah State | 504 | 58.8 | 24.2 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Akron | 837 | 88.6 | 27.4 | 333 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UNLV
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
124
Primary metric
124 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Marshall
134
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
134 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Ball State
109
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
109 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Miami (OH)
81
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 77.1 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
90
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Akron
837 primary output · 88.6 efficiency · 27.4 usage
67.2
#2
2014 Postseason · Utah State
46
504 primary · 58.8 efficiency · 24.2 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Utah State
46
504 primary · 58.8 efficiency · 24.2 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.7833
Boyd Anderson · Fort Lauderdale, FL
- Committed To
- Utah State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
2
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
1,341
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.