Usage Score
7.1
Player Dossier
2014-2018Louisiana
Chaiziere Malbrue
LB • 6'2" • 213 lbs • Carencro, LA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Chaiziere Malbrue shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
21.5
Consistency
33.3
Season Value
24.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Louisiana
141516171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Louisiana
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chaiziere Malbrue, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Louisiana. Chaiziere Malbrue shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.5 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Louisiana paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 21.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico State
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Louisiana
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1
Efficiency
21.5
Usage
7.1
Consistency
33.3
Best Game by takeover score
Tulane
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tulane: 2. Unknown: 2. Mississippi State: 2. Alabama: 0. Texas State: 1. New Mexico State: 3. Arkansas State: 0. Troy: 0. Georgia State: 0. South Alabama: 0. UL Monroe: 2. App State: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tulane: 2 by 28.3. Unknown: 2 by 28.3. Mississippi State: 3 by 32.5. Alabama: 3 by 12.5. Texas State: 4 by 26.7. New Mexico State: 2 by 38.3. Arkansas State: 5 by 20.8. Troy: 3 by 12.5. Georgia State: 0 by 0. South Alabama: 4 by 16.7. UL Monroe: 3 by 32.5. App State: 2 by 8.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1 · Games = 6 · +0.2 vs Losses
Losses0.8 · Games = 5 · -0.2 vs Wins
First Half1.7 · Games = 6 · +1.3 vs Second Half
Second Half0.3 · Games = 6 · -1.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Best efficiency game
38.3 vs New Mexico State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/15 | vs Tulane | L 24-41 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/1 | @ App State | L 19-30 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/24 | @ UL Monroe | W 31-28 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | vs South Alabama | W 48-38 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Georgia State | W 36-22 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Troy | L 16-26 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Arkansas State | W 47-43 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | vs New Mexico State | W 66-38 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Texas State | W 42-27 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Alabama | L 14-56 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Mississippi State | L 10-56 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Louisiana
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
201420152016201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Louisiana | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Louisiana | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Louisiana | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Louisiana | 5 | 16.3 | 5.4 | 5 |
| 2018 Postseason | Louisiana | 12 | 21.5 | 7.1 | 7 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Louisiana | 12 | 21.5 | 7.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas State
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 55.3 takeover score.
#2
New Mexico State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 50.5 takeover score.
#3
UL Monroe
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 37.9 takeover score.
#4
Mississippi State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 37.4 takeover score.
#5
Tulane
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 35.7 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Louisiana
0 primary output · 0 efficiency · — usage
50
#2
2018 Postseason · Louisiana
24.8
12 primary · 21.5 efficiency · 7.1 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Louisiana
24.8
12 primary · 21.5 efficiency · 7.1 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
42
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 19 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.