Usage Score
6.8
Player Dossier
2016-2019UTEP
DB • 5'10" • 195 lbs • Corpus Christi, TX, USA
Adrian Hynson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.1 disruption score.
Usage Score
6.8
Efficiency
26.1
Consistency
9.1
Season Value
12.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · UTEP
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Adrian Hynson, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · UTEP. Adrian Hynson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.1 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
UTEP paired 0 primary output with 7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 26.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
26.1
Usage
6.8
Consistency
9.1
Best Game by takeover score
Rice
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. Texas Tech: 0. Southern Miss: 0. UTSA: 0. Florida International: 0. Louisiana Tech: 2. North Texas: 1. Charlotte: 0. UAB: 0. New Mexico State: 2. Rice: 0
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 1 by 4.2. Texas Tech: 1 by 4.2. Southern Miss: 5 by 20.8. UTSA: 10 by 41.7. Florida International: 5 by 20.8. Louisiana Tech: 5 by 40.8. North Texas: 9 by 47.5. Charlotte: 5 by 20.8. UAB: 5 by 20.8. New Mexico State: 8 by 53.3. Rice: 3 by 12.5
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Best efficiency game
53.3 vs New Mexico State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs Rice | L 16-30 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | @ New Mexico State | L 35-44 | 8 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | @ UAB | L 10-37 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Charlotte | L 21-28 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ North Texas | L 26-52 | 9 | 8 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/27 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 21-42 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Florida International | L 17-32 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/6 | vs UTSA10+ tackles | L 16-26 | 10 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Southern Miss | L 13-31 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/8 | @ Texas Tech | L 3-38 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTEP
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | 7 | 1 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | 6.3 | 1.1 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | 4.2 | 0.8 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTEP | 5 | 26.1 | 6.8 | 5 |
#1 Featured game
Louisiana Tech
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 53.7 takeover score.
#2
New Mexico State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 53.1 takeover score.
#3
North Texas
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 39 takeover score.
#4
UTSA
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 16.3 takeover score.
#5
UAB
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 8.5 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · UTEP
0 primary output · 7 efficiency · 1 usage
36
#2
2017 Regular Season · UTEP
35.8
0 primary · 6.3 efficiency · 1.1 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · UTEP
35
0 primary · 4.2 efficiency · 0.8 usage
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.7583
Flour Bluff · Corpus Christi, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
73
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 22 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Adrian Hynson quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit