Usage Score
14.2
Player Profile
Brady Jones
WR • 5'10" • 185 lbs • George West, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Brady Jones reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
70.3
Consistency
39.3
Season Value
56
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · UTSA
131415161617
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Primary stop by seasons
- UTSA
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · UTSA
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas State
Brady Jones, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · UTSA. Brady Jones reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
UTSA paired 322 primary output with 75.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 70.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · UTSA
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
29.5
Efficiency
70.3
Usage
14.2
Consistency
39.3
Best Game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Baylor: 3. Unknown: 65. Texas State: 75. Southern Miss: 12. North Texas: 23. Rice: 57. UTEP: 14. Florida International: 12. UAB: 32. Marshall: 14. Louisiana Tech: 18
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Baylor: 1 by 20. Unknown: 3 by 100. Texas State: 3 by 100. Southern Miss: 2 by 40. North Texas: 3 by 51.1. Rice: 4 by 95. UTEP: 1 by 93.3. Florida International: 1 by 80. UAB: 3 by 71.1. Marshall: 4 by 23.3. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins32.6 · n=5 · +13.2 vs Losses
Losses19.4 · n=5 · -13.2 vs Wins
First Half39.2 · n=6 · +21.2 vs Second Half
Second Half18 · n=5 · -21.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Texas State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Louisiana Tech
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/26 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 6-20 | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 11/19 | vs Marshall | W 9-7 | — | 4 | 14 | 3.5 | 3.50 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 11/12 | vs UAB | L 19-24 | — | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Florida International | L 7-14 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 12 |
| Sun 10/29 | @ UTEP | W 31-14 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Rice | W 20-7 | — | 4 | 57 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ North Texas | L 26-29 | — | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Southern Miss | L 29-31 | — | 2 | 12 | 0.3 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Texas State | W 44-14 | — | 3 | 75 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 65 | 21.7 | 21.70 | 0 | 30 |
| Sun 9/10 | @ Baylor | W 17-10 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTSA
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
201320142015201620162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTSA | 35 | 52.2 | 15.3 | 35 |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTSA | 52 | 70 | 9.4 | 17 |
| 2016 Postseason | UTSA | 322 | 75.6 | 13.7 | 270 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTSA | 322 | 75.6 | 13.7 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTSA | 325 | 70.3 | 14.2 | 3 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
75
Primary metric
75 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Southern Miss
17
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
17 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UTEP
60
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Rice
57
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 95 efficiency score.
#5
Old Dominion
51
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · UTSA
322 primary output · 75.6 efficiency · 13.7 usage
63.6
#2
2016 Regular Season · UTSA
63.6
322 primary · 75.6 efficiency · 13.7 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · UTSA
56
325 primary · 70.3 efficiency · 14.2 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
734
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.