Usage Score
4.7
Player Dossier
2014-2018UTSA
DT • 6'4" • 295 lbs • Cleveland, TX, USA
Kevin Strong Jr. shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 15.4 disruption score.
Usage Score
4.7
Efficiency
15.4
Consistency
25.7
Season Value
19
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · UTSA
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kevin Strong Jr., DT. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · UTSA. Kevin Strong Jr. shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 15.4 disruption score.
Kevin Strong Jr. played DT for UTSA. Across 5 tracked seasons, Kevin Strong Jr. recorded 65 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with UTSA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
UTSA paired 10.5 primary output with 19.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 15.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
15.4
Usage
4.7
Consistency
25.7
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona State: 0. Baylor: 1. Kansas State: 0. Texas State: 2. UTEP: 2. Rice: 2. Louisiana Tech: 0. Southern Miss: 0. UAB: 0. Florida International: 0. Marshall: 0.5. North Texas: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona State: 1 by 4.2. Baylor: 2 by 18.3. Kansas State: 3 by 12.5. Texas State: 1 by 24.2. UTEP: 2 by 28.3. Rice: 2 by 28.3. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 8.3. Southern Miss: 1 by 4.2. UAB: 1 by 4.2. Florida International: 1 by 4.2. Marshall: 5 by 25.8. North Texas: 3 by 22.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Rice
Best efficiency game
28.3 vs Rice
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/25 | vs North Texas | L 21-24 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Marshall | L 0-23 | 5 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/11 | vs Florida International | L 7-45 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | @ UAB | L 3-52 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Southern Miss | L 17-27 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 3-31 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | @ RiceSplash game | W 20-3 | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs UTEP | W 30-21 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Texas State | W 25-21 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Kansas State | L 17-41 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Baylor | L 20-37 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/2 | @ Arizona State | L 7-49 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTSA
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | UTSA | 1 | 7.6 | 1.6 | 1 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTSA | 1 | 7.6 | 1.6 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTSA | 10.5 | 19.8 | 7.2 | 9.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UTSA | 8.5 | 15.4 | 4.7 | -2 |
#1 Featured game
Texas State
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 52.5 takeover score.
#2
Rice
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.3 takeover score.
#3
UTEP
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.1 takeover score.
#4
Rice
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 44.8 takeover score.
#5
North Texas
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 43.1 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · UTSA
10.5 primary output · 19.8 efficiency · 7.2 usage
19.9
#2
2018 Regular Season · UTSA
19
8.5 primary · 15.4 efficiency · 4.7 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · UTSA
4.1
1 primary · 7.6 efficiency · 1.6 usage
0
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.7652
Cleveland · Cleveland, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
65
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.