Usage / Role
5%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2014-2015North Texas
RB • 5'10" • Southlake, TX, USA
A.J. Ezzard leans balanced backfield option traits and 43.6 efficiency.
Usage / Role
5%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
12
Developing production for a back
Reliability
10
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
24
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2015 Regular Season · North Texas
Snapshot
A.J. Ezzard, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2015 Regular Season · North Texas. A.J. Ezzard leans balanced backfield option traits and 43.6 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | North Texas | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2015 Regular Season | North Texas | 6 | 68 | 60 | 8 | 1 | 53.3 |
Related Context
A.J. Ezzard played RB for North Texas. Across 2 tracked seasons, A.J. Ezzard recorded 60 rushing yards, 8 receiving yards, and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with North Texas.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
North Texas paired 68 primary output with 43.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 43.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2015 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Loss with 26 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Scrimmage Yards / G
11.3
Efficiency
43.6
Usage
4.9
Consistency
55.5
Best Game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. SMU: 7. Rice: 8. Portland State: 13. Marshall: 16. Louisiana Tech: -2. Middle Tennessee: 26
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. SMU: 3 by 24.3. Rice: 3 by 27.8. Portland State: 2 by 58.3. Marshall: 2 by 83.3. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 0. Middle Tennessee: 4 by 67.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Best efficiency game
83.3 vs Marshall
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
North Texas
2014-2015
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | North Texas | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | North Texas | 68 | 43.6 | 4.9 | 68 |
#1 Featured game
@ Middle Tennessee
Week 12 · L 7-41 · Conference game
Loss with 26 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
26
Scrimmage Yards
62.7 takeover
26 scrimmage yards and 7.1 usage.
#2
@ Marshall
Week 8 · L 13-30 · Conference game
16
Scrimmage Yards
51.7 takeover
Loss with 16 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
16 scrimmage yards and 3.6 usage.
#3
vs Portland State
Week 6 · L 7-66
13
Scrimmage Yards
40.2 takeover
Loss with 13 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
13 scrimmage yards and 4.3 usage.
#4
vs Rice
Week 3 · L 24-38 · Conference game
8
Scrimmage Yards
25.7 takeover
Loss with 8 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
8 scrimmage yards and 6.5 usage.
#5
@ SMU
Week 2 · L 13-31
7
Scrimmage Yards
23.1 takeover
Loss with 7 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
7 scrimmage yards and 6.3 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2015 Regular Season · North Texas
68 primary output · 43.6 efficiency · 4.9 usage
53.3
#2
2014 Regular Season · North Texas
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.