Usage Score
4.2
Player Dossier
2014-2015North Texas
Josh Greer
QB • 6'5" • Arlington, TX, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Josh Greer is a balanced quarterback profile with 4.2 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
30.6
Consistency
72
Season Value
43.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · North Texas
1415
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- North Texas
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Iowa
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Josh Greer, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · North Texas. Josh Greer is a balanced quarterback profile with 4.2 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
North Texas paired 129 primary output with 38.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 30.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2015 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Iowa
Loss with 30 yards of offense and 36.7 efficiency. It landed in the 75th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Regular Season · North Texas
Games
4
Primary Metric / G
22.5
Efficiency
30.6
Usage
4.2
Consistency
72
Best Game by takeover score
UTEP
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Iowa: 30. Unknown: 26. Middle Tennessee: 34. UTEP: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa: 5 by 36.7. Unknown: 11 by 38.8. Middle Tennessee: 9 by 46.7. UTEP: 1 by 0
Split Comparison
Losses21.3 · n=3
First Half28 · n=2 · +11 vs Second Half
Second Half17 · n=2 · -11 vs First Half
All Games22.5 · n=4
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Iowa
Best efficiency game
46.7 vs Middle Tennessee
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
North Texas
2014-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
20142015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | North Texas | 129 | 38.2 | 8.1 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | North Texas | 90 | 30.6 | 4.2 | -39 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Iowa
Loss with 30 yards of offense and 36.7 efficiency.
30
Primary metric
30 total offense with 36.7 efficiency.
#2
SMU
71
Primary metric
Win with 71 yards of offense and 58.7 efficiency.
71 total offense with 58.7 efficiency.
#3
Louisiana Tech
75
Primary metric
Loss with 75 yards of offense and 43 efficiency.
75 total offense with 43 efficiency.
#4
Middle Tennessee
34
Primary metric
Loss with 34 yards of offense and 46.7 efficiency.
34 total offense with 46.7 efficiency.
#5
Unknown
26
Primary metric
Game with 26 yards of offense and 38.8 efficiency.
26 total offense with 38.8 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · North Texas
129 primary output · 38.2 efficiency · 8.1 usage
50.2
#2
2015 Regular Season · North Texas
43.9
90 primary · 30.6 efficiency · 4.2 usage
Milestones
0
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
0
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
219
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 7 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.