Usage Score
1.7
Player Dossier
2014-2016Colorado
Ahkello Witherspoon
DB • 6'3" • Sacramento, CA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Ahkello Witherspoon shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.1 disruption score.
Efficiency
21.1
Consistency
44.9
Season Value
38.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Colorado
14151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Colorado
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ahkello Witherspoon, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Colorado. Ahkello Witherspoon shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.1 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Colorado paired 2 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 21.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Utah
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Colorado
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
1.4
Efficiency
21.1
Usage
1.7
Consistency
44.9
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 1. Colorado State: 2. Unknown: 1. Michigan: 2. Oregon: 2. Oregon State: 1. USC: 1. Arizona State: 2. Stanford: 0. UCLA: 0. Arizona: 0. Washington State: 3. Utah: 4. Washington: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 1 by 14.2. Colorado State: 0 by 20. Unknown: 0 by 10. Michigan: 2 by 28.3. Oregon: 5 by 40.8. Oregon State: 0 by 10. USC: 1 by 14.2. Arizona State: 0 by 20. Stanford: 1 by 4.2. UCLA: 3 by 12.5. Arizona: 5 by 20.8. Washington State: 1 by 34.2. Utah: 3 by 52.5. Washington: 1 by 14.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.6 · Games = 9 · +0.3 vs Losses
Losses1.3 · Games = 4 · -0.3 vs Wins
First Half1.4 · Games = 7 · +0 vs Second Half
Second Half1.4 · Games = 7 · +0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Utah
Best efficiency game
52.5 vs Utah
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/30 | vs Oklahoma State | L 8-38 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 12/3 | @ Washington | L 10-41 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/27 | vs Utah | W 27-22 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 4 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Washington State | W 38-24 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Arizona | W 49-24 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/4 | vs UCLA | W 20-10 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Stanford | W 10-5 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/16 | vs Arizona State | W 40-16 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | @ USC | L 17-21 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Oregon State | W 47-6 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Oregon | W 41-38 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Michigan | L 28-45 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Colorado State | W 44-7 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Colorado
2014-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Colorado | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Colorado | 2 | 20 | — | 2 |
| 2016 Postseason | Colorado | 20 | 21.1 | 1.7 | 18 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Colorado | 20 | 21.1 | 1.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arizona State
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#2
Oregon
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Utah
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 51.5 takeover score.
#4
Washington State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 36.7 takeover score.
#5
Oregon
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 33.4 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Colorado
2 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
42.9
#2
2016 Postseason · Colorado
38.7
20 primary · 21.1 efficiency · 1.7 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Colorado
38.7
20 primary · 21.1 efficiency · 1.7 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
23
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.