Usage Score
20.5
Player Dossier
2014-2017Colorado
WR • 5'11" • 185 lbs • Bellflower, CA, USA
Shay Fields reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
20.5
Efficiency
80.8
Consistency
52.6
Season Value
63.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Colorado
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Shay Fields, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Colorado. Shay Fields reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Colorado paired 883 primary output with 80.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 80.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oregon State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
63.1
Efficiency
80.8
Usage
20.5
Consistency
52.6
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 38. Colorado State: 79. Unknown: 78. Michigan: 99. Oregon: 35. Oregon State: 169. USC: 32. Arizona State: 20. Stanford: 51. UCLA: 39. Arizona: 108. Washington State: 31. Utah: 78. Washington: 26
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 4 by 63.3. Colorado State: 3 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 100. Michigan: 4 by 100. Oregon: 5 by 46.7. Oregon State: 7 by 100. USC: 4 by 53.3. Arizona State: 2 by 66.7. Stanford: 4 by 85. UCLA: 3 by 86.7. Arizona: 6 by 100. Washington State: 3 by 68.9. Utah: 7 by 74.3. Washington: 2 by 86.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Oregon State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arizona
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/30 | vs Oklahoma State | L 8-38 | — | 4 | 38 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 12/3 | @ Washington | L 10-41 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 21 |
| Sun 11/27 | vs Utah | W 27-22 | — | 7 | 78 | 11.1 | 11.10 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Washington State | W 38-24 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Arizona100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 49-24 | — | 6 | 108 | 18 | 18 | 2 | 47 |
| Fri 11/4 | vs UCLA | W 20-10 | — | 3 | 39 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Stanford | W 10-5 | — | 4 | 51 | 12.6 | 12.80 | 1 | 15 |
| Sun 10/16 | vs Arizona State | W 40-16 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ USC | L 17-21 | — | 4 | 32 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Oregon State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 47-6 | — | 7 | 169 | 24.1 | 24.10 | 3 | 63 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Oregon | W 41-38 | — | 5 | 35 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Michigan | L 28-45 | — | 4 | 99 | 24.8 | 24.80 | 1 | 70 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 78 | 39 | 39 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Colorado State | W 44-7 | — | 3 | 79 | 26.3 | 26.30 | 0 | 60 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Colorado
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Colorado | 486 | 59.7 | 15.2 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Colorado | 598 | 74.9 | 17.9 | 112 |
| 2016 Postseason | Colorado | 883 | 80.8 | 20.5 | 285 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Colorado | 883 | 80.8 | 20.5 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Colorado | 623 | 66.6 | 20 | -260 |
#1 Featured game
Oregon State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
169
Primary metric
169 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Arizona
168
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
168 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Arizona State
128
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
128 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Massachusetts
93
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
93 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Arizona
94
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Colorado
883 primary output · 80.8 efficiency · 20.5 usage
63.5
#2
2016 Regular Season · Colorado
63.5
883 primary · 80.8 efficiency · 20.5 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Colorado
51.9
598 primary · 74.9 efficiency · 17.9 usage
7
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.8642
St. John Bosco · Bellflower, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
2,590
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 48 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Shay Fields quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit