Usage / Role
0%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2014-2018Texas A&M
FB • 6'2" • 235 lbs • Katy, TX, USA
Cullen Gillaspia leans balanced backfield option traits and 64.4 efficiency.
Usage / Role
0%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
0
Developing production for a back
Reliability
0
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
14
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2018 Postseason · Texas A&M
Snapshot
NFL Draft
Cullen Gillaspia, FB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2018 Postseason · Texas A&M. Cullen Gillaspia leans balanced backfield option traits and 64.4 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2016 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 |
| 2017 Postseason | Texas A&M | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 |
| 2018 Postseason | Texas A&M | 10 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 1 | 52.9 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 10 | 65 | 13 | 52 | 0 | 52.9 |
Related Context
Cullen Gillaspia played FB for Texas A&M. Across 5 tracked seasons, Cullen Gillaspia recorded 33 rushing yards, 52 receiving yards, and 24 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Texas A&M.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 85 primary output with 64.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Mississippi State
Loss with 0 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Scrimmage Yards / G
0
Efficiency
—
Usage
0
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UCLA: 0. Prairie View A&M: 0. Arkansas: 0. South Carolina: 0. Tennessee: 0. Mississippi State: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Best efficiency game
— vs Mississippi State
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas A&M
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Texas A&M | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Texas A&M | 85 | 64.4 | 1.8 | 85 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 85 | 64.4 | 1.8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs Clemson
Week 2 · L 26-28
Loss with 26 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
26
Scrimmage Yards
63.9 takeover
26 scrimmage yards and 3.6 usage.
#2
vs LSU
Week 13 · W 74-72 · Conference game
18
Scrimmage Yards
57.6 takeover
Win with 18 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
18 scrimmage yards and 1.3 usage.
#3
vs NC State
Week 1 · W 52-13 · Postseason
20
Scrimmage Yards
54.8 takeover
Win with 20 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
20 scrimmage yards and 6.3 usage.
#4
vs UAB
Week 12 · W 41-20
8
Scrimmage Yards
40.1 takeover
Win with 8 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
8 scrimmage yards and 2.2 usage.
#5
@ Auburn
Week 10 · L 24-28 · Conference game
9
Scrimmage Yards
38.1 takeover
Loss with 9 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
9 scrimmage yards and 1.6 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2018 Postseason · Texas A&M
85 primary output · 64.4 efficiency · 1.8 usage
52.9
#2
2018 Regular Season · Texas A&M
52.9
85 primary · 64.4 efficiency · 1.8 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Texas A&M
50
0 primary · — efficiency · 0 usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.