Usage / Role
100%
Featured defensive role
Player Dossier
2014-2018Wisconsin
ILB • 6'1" • 248 lbs • Lake Villa, IL, USA
T.J. Edwards shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 47.4 disruption score.
Usage / Role
100%
Featured defensive role
Impact Production
80
High-end production for a linebacker
Reliability
100
Regular contributor with several takeover games
Star Power
60
Useful peak profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2017 Postseason · Wisconsin
Snapshot
Player Story
T.J. Edwards built his college career from 2014 through 2018 as an inside linebacker from Lake Villa, IL wearing No. 53, spending time with Wisconsin. The clearest part of T.J. Edwards' career was his defensive...
Read the storyT.J. Edwards, ILB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2017 Postseason · Wisconsin. T.J. Edwards shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 47.4 disruption score.
Stat Footprint

Featured Highlight
T.J. Edwards Wisconsin Highlights
2018 · Wisconsin · Player Highlight
T.J. Edwards college highlights at Wisconsin.
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2015 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2016 Postseason | Wisconsin | 13 | 10 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 64.8 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 13 | 79 | 8.5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 64.8 |
| 2017 Postseason | Wisconsin | 14 | 6 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 70.8 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 14 | 75 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 70.8 |
| 2018 Postseason | Wisconsin | 13 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 70.7 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 13 | 103 | 10.5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 70.7 |
Related Context
T.J. Edwards played ILB for Wisconsin. Across 5 tracked seasons, T.J. Edwards recorded 273 tackles and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Wisconsin.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Wisconsin paired 26 primary output with 42.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 47.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Loss with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.7
Efficiency
47.4
Usage
14.7
Consistency
52.6
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 1. Western Kentucky: 1. New Mexico: 2. BYU: 1.5. Iowa: 2. Nebraska: 4. Michigan: 5. Illinois: 1. Northwestern: 0. Rutgers: 2. Penn State: 0. Purdue: 2. Minnesota: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Kentucky: 7 by 39.2. New Mexico: 4 by 36.7. BYU: 3 by 27.5. Iowa: 5 by 40.8. Nebraska: 7 by 69.2. Michigan: 10 by 91.7. Illinois: 5 by 30.8. Northwestern: 13 by 50. Rutgers: 7 by 49.2. Penn State: 14 by 50. Purdue: 10 by 61.7. Minnesota: 18 by 50
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Michigan
Best efficiency game
91.7 vs Michigan
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/27 | vs Miami | W 35-3 | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/24 | vs Minnesota10+ tackles | L 15-37 | 18 | 12 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Purdue10+ tackles · Splash game | W 47-44 | 10 | 9 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Penn State10+ tackles | L 10-22 | 14 | 12 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | vs RutgersSplash game | W 31-17 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Northwestern10+ tackles | L 17-31 | 13 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Illinois | W 49-20 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Michigan10+ tackles · Splash game | L 13-38 | 10 | 6 | — | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Nebraska2+ sacks · Splash game | W 41-24 | 7 | 3 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/23 | @ IowaSplash game | W 28-17 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs BYU | L 21-24 | 3 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | vs New MexicoSplash game | W 45-14 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Western Kentucky | W 34-3 | 7 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Player Story
T.J. Edwards built his college career from 2014 through 2018 as an inside linebacker from Lake Villa, IL wearing No. 53, spending time with Wisconsin. The clearest part of T.J. Edwards' career was his defensive production: 273 tackles, 30 tackles for loss, 8 sacks, and 10 interceptions across 40 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2018 with Wisconsin. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
Defensive careers can be hard to read from one number, but T.J. Edwards' production has multiple signals. With 40 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Wisconsin.
The arc is straightforward: T.J. Edwards moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Wisconsin
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Wisconsin | 19.5 | 43.5 | 12.1 | 19.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 19.5 | 43.5 | 12.1 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Wisconsin | 26 | 42.3 | 10.9 | 6.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 26 | 42.3 | 10.9 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Wisconsin | 21.5 | 47.4 | 14.7 | -4.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 21.5 | 47.4 | 14.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs Michigan
Week 12 · W 24-10 · Conference game
Win with 5.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5.5
Havoc Plays
98.6 takeover
5.5 disruption/tackle impact with 98.6 takeover score.
#2
@ Michigan
Week 7 · L 13-38 · Conference game
5
Havoc Plays
97.2 takeover
Loss with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5 disruption/tackle impact with 97.2 takeover score.
#3
@ Northwestern
Week 10 · W 21-7 · Conference game
4.5
Havoc Plays
90 takeover
Win with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 90 takeover score.
#4
vs Nebraska
Week 6 · W 41-24 · Conference game
4
Havoc Plays
83.1 takeover
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 83.1 takeover score.
#5
vs Minnesota
Week 13 · W 31-17 · Conference game
3
Havoc Plays
80.8 takeover
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 80.8 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2017 Postseason · Wisconsin
26 primary output · 42.3 efficiency · 10.9 usage
70.8
#2
2017 Regular Season · Wisconsin
70.8
26 primary · 42.3 efficiency · 10.9 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Wisconsin
70.7
21.5 primary · 47.4 efficiency · 14.7 usage
15
Impact games
19
Splash games
10
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.