Usage Score
23.5
Player Profile
JuJu Smith-Schuster
WR • 6'2" • Long Beach, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
JuJu Smith-Schuster reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
74.4
Consistency
61.7
Season Value
56.2
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · USC
141415151616
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Primary stop by seasons
- USC
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · USC
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
JuJu Smith-Schuster, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · USC. JuJu Smith-Schuster reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
USC paired 1,454 primary output with 92 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 74.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · USC
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
70.3
Efficiency
74.4
Usage
23.5
Consistency
61.7
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 133. Alabama: 9. Utah State: 56. Stanford: 34. Utah: 98. Arizona State: 123. Colorado: 113. Arizona: 132. California: 66. Oregon: 10. Washington: 41. UCLA: 76. Notre Dame: 23
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 7 by 100. Alabama: 1 by 60. Utah State: 7 by 53.3. Stanford: 3 by 75.6. Utah: 8 by 81.7. Arizona State: 7 by 100. Colorado: 5 by 100. Arizona: 9 by 97.8. California: 6 by 73.3. Oregon: 2 by 33.3. Washington: 3 by 91.1. UCLA: 8 by 63.3. Notre Dame: 4 by 38.3
Split Comparison
Wins77.3 · n=10 · +30.3 vs Losses
Losses47 · n=3 · -30.3 vs Wins
First Half80.9 · n=7 · +22.9 vs Second Half
Second Half58 · n=6 · -22.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arizona
Best efficiency game
100 vs Penn State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/2 | @ Penn State100 receiving yards | W 52-49 | — | 7 | 133 | 16.9 | 19 | 1 | 36 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Notre Dame | W 45-27 | — | 4 | 23 | 5.8 | 5.80 | 1 | 9 |
| Sun 11/20 | @ UCLAHigh volume | W 36-14 | — | 8 | 76 | 8.9 | 9.50 | 0 | 28 |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Washington | W 26-13 | — | 3 | 41 | 9.3 | 13.70 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Oregon | W 45-20 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 9 |
| Fri 10/28 | vs California | W 45-24 | — | 6 | 66 | 11.4 | 11 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Arizona100 receiving yards · High volume | W 48-14 | — | 9 | 132 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 3 | 46 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Colorado100 receiving yards | W 21-17 | — | 5 | 113 | 22.6 | 22.60 | 0 | 34 |
| Sun 10/2 | vs Arizona State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 41-20 | — | 7 | 123 | 17.6 | 17.60 | 3 | 67 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ UtahHigh volume | L 27-31 | — | 8 | 98 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 35 |
| Sun 9/18 | @ Stanford | L 10-27 | — | 3 | 34 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Utah State2+ TD | W 45-7 | — | 7 | 56 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 15 |
| Sun 9/4 | @ Alabama | L 6-52 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
USC
2014-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201420142015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Postseason | USC | 724 | 66.9 | 17 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | USC | 724 | 66.9 | 17 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | USC | 1,454 | 92 | 29.4 | 730 |
| 2015 Regular Season | USC | 1,454 | 92 | 29.4 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | USC | 914 | 74.4 | 23.5 | -540 |
| 2016 Regular Season | USC | 914 | 74.4 | 23.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arizona
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
132
Primary metric
132 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
#2
Idaho
192
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
192 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Arizona State
123
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Penn State
133
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
133 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Fresno State
123
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · USC
1,454 primary output · 92 efficiency · 29.4 usage
72.8
#2
2015 Regular Season · USC
72.8
1,454 primary · 92 efficiency · 29.4 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · USC
56.2
914 primary · 74.4 efficiency · 23.5 usage
Milestones
12
100+ receiving yards
8
8+ catch outings
6
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.9904
Long Beach Poly · Long Beach, CA
- Committed To
- USC
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
3,092
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.