Usage Score
15.3
Player Dossier
2014-2017Stanford
Harrison Phillips
DT • 6'4" • 295 lbs • Omaha, NE, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Harrison Phillips shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 43.1 disruption score.
Efficiency
43.1
Consistency
47.4
Season Value
32.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Stanford
141516161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Stanford
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Harrison Phillips, DT. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Stanford. Harrison Phillips shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 43.1 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Stanford paired 22 primary output with 43.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 43.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Stanford
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
1.6
Efficiency
43.1
Usage
15.3
Consistency
47.4
Best Game by takeover score
TCU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. TCU: 0. Rice: 0. USC: 0. San Diego State: 1. UCLA: 2. Arizona State: 2.5. Utah: 1. Oregon: 2. Oregon State: 2. Washington State: 3.5. Washington: 1.5. California: 0.5. Notre Dame: 5. USC: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. TCU: 3 by 12.5. Rice: 5 by 20.8. USC: 11 by 45.8. San Diego State: 11 by 55.8. UCLA: 3 by 32.5. Arizona State: 9 by 62.5. Utah: 6 by 35. Oregon: 3 by 32.5. Oregon State: 9 by 57.5. Washington State: 7 by 64.2. Washington: 2 by 23.3. California: 5 by 25.8. Notre Dame: 6 by 75. USC: 13 by 60
Split Comparison
Wins1.8 · n=9 · +0.7 vs Losses
Losses1.1 · n=5 · -0.7 vs Wins
First Half0.9 · n=7 · -1.3 vs Second Half
Second Half2.2 · n=7 · +1.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Best efficiency game
75 vs Notre Dame
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/29 | @ TCU | L 37-39 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/2 | @ USC10+ tackles | L 28-31 | 13 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/26 | vs Notre Dame2+ sacks · Splash game | W 38-20 | 6 | 5 | — | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/19 | vs California | W 17-14 | 5 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Washington | W 30-22 | 2 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Washington StateSplash game | L 21-24 | 7 | 4 | — | 2.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 10/27 | @ Oregon StateSplash game | W 15-14 | 9 | 5 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/15 | vs Oregon | W 49-7 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/8 | @ Utah | W 23-20 | 6 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Arizona State | W 34-24 | 9 | 0 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/24 | vs UCLA | W 58-34 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/17 | @ San Diego State10+ tackles | L 17-20 | 11 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/10 | @ USC10+ tackles | L 24-42 | 11 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 8/27 | @ Rice | W 62-7 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Stanford
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
201420152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Stanford | 17 | 30.1 | 9.7 | 17 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Stanford | 17 | 30.1 | 9.7 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Stanford | 22 | 43.1 | 15.3 | 5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Stanford | 22 | 43.1 | 15.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Notre Dame
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 64.9 takeover score.
#2
North Carolina
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 54.4 takeover score.
#3
Washington State
3.5
Primary metric
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 52.9 takeover score.
#4
Kansas State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 50.2 takeover score.
#5
UCLA
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 49.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Stanford
22 primary output · 43.1 efficiency · 15.3 usage
32.5
#2
2017 Regular Season · Stanford
32.5
22 primary · 43.1 efficiency · 15.3 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Stanford
29.5
17 primary · 30.1 efficiency · 9.7 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
4
Splash games
3
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
139
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.