Usage Score
15.5
Player Dossier
2014-2017North Carolina
WR • 5'10" • 185 lbs • Charlotte, NC, USA
Austin Proehl reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
15.5
Efficiency
90.3
Consistency
72.1
Season Value
60.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · North Carolina
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Austin Proehl, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · North Carolina. Austin Proehl reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
North Carolina paired 597 primary output with 80.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 90.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisville
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Receiving Yards / G
56.2
Efficiency
90.3
Usage
15.5
Consistency
72.1
Best Game by takeover score
NC State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. California: 55. Louisville: 120. Old Dominion: 48. Duke: 47. Unknown: 52. NC State: 15
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. California: 4 by 91.7. Louisville: 8 by 100. Old Dominion: 3 by 100. Duke: 1 by 100. Unknown: 3 by 100. NC State: 2 by 50
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Louisville
Best efficiency game
100 vs Unknown
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
North Carolina
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Postseason | North Carolina | 106 | 50.9 | 5.1 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | North Carolina | 106 | 50.9 | 5.1 | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | North Carolina | 225 | 83.1 | 10.9 | 119 |
| 2016 Postseason | North Carolina | 597 | 80.3 | 13 | 372 |
| 2016 Regular Season | North Carolina | 597 | 80.3 | 13 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | North Carolina | 337 | 90.3 | 15.5 | -260 |
#1 Featured game
Louisville
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
120
Primary metric
120 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Pittsburgh
99
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 94.3 efficiency score.
#3
Wake Forest
94
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Stanford
91
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
91 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#5
Clemson
20
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · North Carolina
597 primary output · 80.3 efficiency · 13 usage
61.3
#2
2016 Regular Season · North Carolina
61.3
597 primary · 80.3 efficiency · 13 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · North Carolina
60.7
337 primary · 90.3 efficiency · 15.5 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,265
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Austin Proehl quick answers