Usage Score
8.9
Player Dossier
2014-2017Purdue
Gelen Robinson
DE • 6'1" • 280 lbs • Schererville, IN, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Gelen Robinson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.7 disruption score.
Efficiency
28.7
Consistency
33.1
Season Value
25.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Purdue
1415161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Purdue
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Nebraska
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Gelen Robinson, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Purdue. Gelen Robinson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.7 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Purdue paired 14.5 primary output with 33.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 28.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Nebraska
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Purdue
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.5
Efficiency
28.7
Usage
8.9
Consistency
33.1
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 1. Louisville: 0. Ohio: 1. Missouri: 0. Michigan: 3. Minnesota: 0. Wisconsin: 0. Rutgers: 0. Nebraska: 8. Illinois: 1. Northwestern: 1. Iowa: 2. Indiana: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 3 by 22.5. Louisville: 6 by 25. Ohio: 1 by 14.2. Missouri: 1 by 4.2. Michigan: 6 by 55. Minnesota: 4 by 16.7. Wisconsin: 3 by 12.5. Rutgers: 3 by 12.5. Nebraska: 9 by 87.5. Illinois: 0 by 10. Northwestern: 4 by 26.7. Iowa: 4 by 36.7. Indiana: 7 by 49.2
Split Comparison
Wins1 · n=7 · -1 vs Losses
Losses2 · n=6 · +1 vs Wins
First Half0.7 · n=7 · -1.6 vs Second Half
Second Half2.3 · n=6 · +1.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Nebraska
Best efficiency game
87.5 vs Nebraska
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/28 | vs Arizona | W 38-35 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/25 | vs Indiana | W 31-24 | 7 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Iowa | W 24-15 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/12 | @ Northwestern | L 13-23 | 4 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Illinois | W 29-10 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Nebraska2+ sacks · Splash game | L 24-25 | 9 | 7 | — | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Rutgers | L 12-14 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Wisconsin | L 9-17 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Minnesota | W 31-17 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs MichiganSplash game | L 10-28 | 6 | 5 | — | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Missouri | W 35-3 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Ohio | W 44-21 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Louisville | L 28-35 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Purdue
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
20142015201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Purdue | 14.5 | 33.3 | 14.3 | 14.5 |
| 2017 Postseason | Purdue | 19 | 28.7 | 8.9 | 4.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Purdue | 19 | 28.7 | 8.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Nebraska
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
8
Primary metric
8 disruption/tackle impact with 76.8 takeover score.
#2
Indiana
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 60.9 takeover score.
#3
Minnesota
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 58.8 takeover score.
#4
Wisconsin
2.5
Primary metric
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 50.1 takeover score.
#5
Maryland
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 42.8 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Purdue
14.5 primary output · 33.3 efficiency · 14.3 usage
29.5
#2
2017 Postseason · Purdue
25.1
19 primary · 28.7 efficiency · 8.9 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Purdue
25.1
19 primary · 28.7 efficiency · 8.9 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
4
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
112
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.