Usage / Role
15%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2014-2018Purdue
TE • 6'4" • 245 lbs • Leesburg, VA, USA
Cole Herdman reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
15%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
36
Developing production for a tight end
Reliability
32
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
55
Useful peak profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Purdue
Snapshot
Player Story
Cole Herdman built his college career from 2014 through 2018 as a tight end from Leesburg, VA wearing No. 88, spending time with Purdue. The clearest part of Cole Herdman's career was his receiving role: 91 catches,...
Read the storyCole Herdman, TE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Purdue. Cole Herdman reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2015 Regular Season | Purdue | 11 | 18 | 139 | 2 | 46.8 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Purdue | 12 | 35 | 344 | 3 | 62.5 |
| 2017 Postseason | Purdue | 12 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 59.4 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Purdue | 12 | 19 | 316 | 3 | 59.4 |
| 2018 Postseason | Purdue | 10 | 3 | 17 | 0 | 53.6 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Purdue | 10 | 15 | 179 | 0 | 53.6 |
Related Context
Cole Herdman played TE for Purdue. Across 5 tracked seasons, Cole Herdman recorded 1,010 receiving yards, 1 tackles, and 8 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Purdue.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Purdue paired 344 primary output with 67.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 67.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Iowa
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
28.7
Efficiency
67.6
Usage
10.7
Consistency
47
Best Game by takeover score
Iowa
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Eastern Kentucky: 22. Cincinnati: 36. Nevada: 20. Maryland: 23. Illinois: 9. Iowa: 104. Nebraska: 39. Penn State: 33. Minnesota: 29. Northwestern: 7. Wisconsin: 16. Indiana: 6
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Eastern Kentucky: 1 by 100. Cincinnati: 3 by 80. Nevada: 1 by 100. Maryland: 4 by 38.3. Illinois: 1 by 60. Iowa: 7 by 99. Nebraska: 5 by 52. Penn State: 7 by 31.4. Minnesota: 3 by 64.4. Northwestern: 1 by 46.7. Wisconsin: 1 by 100. Indiana: 1 by 40
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Iowa
Best efficiency game
100 vs Wisconsin
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | @ Indiana | L 24-26 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Wisconsin | L 20-49 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Northwestern | L 17-45 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Minnesota | L 31-44 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Penn State | L 24-62 | — | 7 | 33 | 4.7 | 4.70 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Nebraska | L 14-27 | — | 5 | 39 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Iowa100 receiving yards | L 35-49 | — | 7 | 104 | 14.9 | 14.90 | 1 | 53 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Illinois | W 34-31 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Maryland | L 7-50 | — | 4 | 23 | 5.8 | 5.80 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Nevada | W 24-14 | — | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Cincinnati | L 20-38 | — | 3 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Eastern Kentucky | W 45-24 | — | 1 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 22 |
Player Story
Cole Herdman built his college career from 2014 through 2018 as a tight end from Leesburg, VA wearing No. 88, spending time with Purdue. The clearest part of Cole Herdman's career was his receiving role: 91 catches, 1,010 receiving yards, and 8 touchdowns across 45 career games in the available record. His career also includes 1 tackle, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. That gives Cole Herdman's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Purdue
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Purdue | 139 | 53.6 | 7.5 | 139 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Purdue | 344 | 67.6 | 10.7 | 205 |
| 2017 Postseason | Purdue | 331 | 72.8 | 7.5 | -13 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Purdue | 331 | 72.8 | 7.5 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Purdue | 196 | 64.9 | 8.6 | -135 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Purdue | 196 | 64.9 | 8.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs Iowa
Week 7 · L 35-49 · Conference game
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
104
Receiving Yards
92.2 takeover
104 receiving yards with a 99 efficiency score.
#2
vs Ohio
Week 2 · W 44-21
87
Receiving Yards
80.6 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
87 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
vs Eastern Michigan
Week 2 · L 19-20
33
Receiving Yards
78.8 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#4
vs Ohio State
Week 8 · W 49-20 · Conference game
36
Receiving Yards
75.6 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
36 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
@ Indiana
Week 13 · W 28-21 · Conference game
31
Receiving Yards
70.3 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Regular Season · Purdue
344 primary output · 67.6 efficiency · 10.7 usage
62.5
#2
2017 Postseason · Purdue
59.4
331 primary · 72.8 efficiency · 7.5 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Purdue
59.4
331 primary · 72.8 efficiency · 7.5 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.