Usage Score
8.3
Player Dossier
2009-2011Missouri
Jimmy Costello
QB • 6'3" • Liberty, MO, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Jimmy Costello is a balanced quarterback profile with 8.3 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
62.3
Consistency
15.2
Season Value
46.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Missouri
09101111
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Missouri
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jimmy Costello, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Missouri. Jimmy Costello is a balanced quarterback profile with 8.3 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Missouri paired 98 primary output with 62.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 62.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with 99 yards of offense and 84.1 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · Missouri
Games
3
Primary Metric / G
32.7
Efficiency
62.3
Usage
8.3
Consistency
15.2
Best Game by takeover score
North Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. North Carolina: 4. Unknown: 99. Iowa State: -5
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Carolina: 1 by 77.8. Unknown: 10 by 84.1. Iowa State: 2 by 25
Split Comparison
Wins-0.5 · n=2
First Half51.5 · n=2
All Games32.7 · n=3
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
84.1 vs Unknown
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Missouri
2009-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
2009201020112011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Missouri | 58 | 42 | 3.2 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Missouri | 0 | — | — | -58 |
| 2011 Postseason | Missouri | 98 | 62.3 | 8.3 | 98 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Missouri | 98 | 62.3 | 8.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with 99 yards of offense and 84.1 efficiency.
99
Primary metric
99 total offense with 84.1 efficiency.
#2
Unknown
27
Primary metric
Game with 27 yards of offense and 46.5 efficiency.
27 total offense with 46.5 efficiency.
#3
North Carolina
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 yards of offense and 77.8 efficiency.
4 total offense with 77.8 efficiency.
#4
Illinois
6
Primary metric
Win with 6 yards of offense and 58.3 efficiency.
6 total offense with 58.3 efficiency.
#5
Texas
25
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
25 total offense with 21.2 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · Missouri
98 primary output · 62.3 efficiency · 8.3 usage
46.4
#2
2011 Regular Season · Missouri
46.4
98 primary · 62.3 efficiency · 8.3 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Missouri
44.5
58 primary · 42 efficiency · 3.2 usage
Milestones
0
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
2
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
156
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 6 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.