Usage Score
32.7
Player Dossier
2008-2009Navy
Mario Washington
WR • 6'0" • Boiling Springs, NC, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Mario Washington reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
91.9
Consistency
52.8
Season Value
69.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Navy
08080909
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Navy
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mario Washington, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Navy. Mario Washington reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Navy paired 165 primary output with 91.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 91.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Postseason · Navy
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
13.8
Efficiency
91.9
Usage
32.7
Consistency
52.8
Best Game by takeover score
Missouri
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Missouri: 0. Ohio State: 17. Louisiana Tech: 51. Pittsburgh: 17. Air Force: 0. Rice: 15. SMU: 13. Wake Forest: 0. Temple: 31. Notre Dame: 0. Unknown: 21. Army: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 2 by 56.7. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 100. Pittsburgh: 1 by 100. Rice: 1 by 100. SMU: 1 by 86.7. Temple: 1 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins9.9 · n=8 · -11.8 vs Losses
Losses21.7 · n=3 · +11.8 vs Wins
First Half16.7 · n=6 · +5.8 vs Second Half
Second Half10.8 · n=6 · -5.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Best efficiency game
100 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/31 | @ Missouri | W 35-13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 12/12 | vs Army | W 17-3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/14 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Notre Dame | W 23-21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Temple | L 24-27 | — | 1 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Wake Forest | W 13-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 10/18 | @ SMU | W 38-35 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Rice | W 63-14 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Air Force | W 16-13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Pittsburgh | L 14-27 | — | 1 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 32-14 | — | 2 | 51 | 25.5 | 25.50 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/5 | @ Ohio State | L 27-31 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 12 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Navy
2008-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
2008200820092009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Postseason | Navy | 56 | 83.4 | 41.7 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Navy | 56 | 83.4 | 41.7 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Navy | 165 | 91.9 | 32.7 | 109 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Navy | 165 | 91.9 | 32.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Pittsburgh
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
46
Primary metric
46 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Louisiana Tech
51
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Temple
31
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Rice
15
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
21
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
21 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · Navy
165 primary output · 91.9 efficiency · 32.7 usage
69.2
#2
2009 Regular Season · Navy
69.2
165 primary · 91.9 efficiency · 32.7 usage
#3
2008 Postseason · Navy
41.4
56 primary · 83.4 efficiency · 41.7 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
221
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 22 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.