Usage Score
7.7
Player Dossier
2007-2010TCU
WR • 6'0" • Lockhart, TX, USA
Curtis Clay reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
7.7
Efficiency
63.3
Consistency
64.3
Season Value
39.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · TCU
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Curtis Clay, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · TCU. Curtis Clay reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
TCU paired 241 primary output with 64.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 63.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2010 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oregon State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Receiving Yards / G
7.3
Efficiency
63.3
Usage
7.7
Consistency
64.3
Best Game by takeover score
New Mexico
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oregon State: 13. Unknown: 12. Baylor: 11. SMU: 8. San Diego State: 0. New Mexico: 0
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oregon State: 1 by 86.7. Unknown: 2 by 40. Baylor: 1 by 73.3. SMU: 1 by 53.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Oregon State
Best efficiency game
86.7 vs Oregon State
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
TCU
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | TCU | 24 | 80 | 4.3 | — |
| 2008 Postseason | TCU | 98 | 61.7 | 7.1 | 74 |
| 2008 Regular Season | TCU | 98 | 61.7 | 7.1 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | TCU | 241 | 64.4 | 10.2 | 143 |
| 2009 Regular Season | TCU | 241 | 64.4 | 10.2 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | TCU | 44 | 63.3 | 7.7 | -197 |
#1 Featured game
Colorado State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
70
Primary metric
70 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Wyoming
32
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Oregon State
13
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
13 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#4
Utah
13
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
13 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#5
Air Force
22
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
22 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · TCU
241 primary output · 64.4 efficiency · 10.2 usage
52
#2
2009 Regular Season · TCU
52
241 primary · 64.4 efficiency · 10.2 usage
#3
2007 Regular Season · TCU
48.3
24 primary · 80 efficiency · 4.3 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
407
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Curtis Clay quick answers