Usage Score
32.6
Player Dossier
2007-2009Central Michigan
Antonio Brown
WR • 5'10" • Miami, FL, USA
Alpha targetPossession profile
Antonio Brown reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
67.2
Consistency
58.9
Season Value
61.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Central Michigan
070708080909
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Central Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ball State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Antonio Brown, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Central Michigan. Antonio Brown reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Central Michigan paired 1,198 primary output with 67.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 67.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ball State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Postseason · Central Michigan
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
85.6
Efficiency
67.2
Usage
32.6
Consistency
58.9
Best Game by takeover score
Troy
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Troy: 178. Arizona: 23. Michigan State: 71. Unknown: 32. Akron: 89. Buffalo: 112. Eastern Michigan: 110. Western Michigan: 39. Bowling Green: 68. Boston College: 61. Toledo: 129. Ball State: 170. Northern Illinois: 50. Ohio: 66
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Troy: 13 by 91.3. Arizona: 5 by 30.7. Michigan State: 10 by 47.3. Unknown: 4 by 53.3. Akron: 9 by 65.9. Buffalo: 6 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 4 by 100. Western Michigan: 5 by 52. Bowling Green: 5 by 90.7. Boston College: 8 by 50.8. Toledo: 13 by 66.2. Ball State: 11 by 100. Northern Illinois: 9 by 37. Ohio: 8 by 55
Split Comparison
Wins98.4 · n=11 · +56.4 vs Losses
Losses42 · n=2 · -56.4 vs Wins
First Half87.9 · n=7 · +4.6 vs Second Half
Second Half83.3 · n=7 · -4.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ball State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ball State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 1/7 | @ Troy100 receiving yards · High volume | W 44-41 | — | 13 | 178 | 11.8 | 13.70 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 12/5 | vs OhioHigh volume | W 20-10 | — | 8 | 66 | 6.6 | 8.30 | 0 | 21 |
| Fri 11/27 | vs Northern IllinoisHigh volume | W 45-31 | — | 9 | 50 | 5.3 | 5.60 | 0 | 29 |
| Thu 11/19 | @ Ball State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 35-3 | — | 11 | 170 | 13.7 | 15.50 | 1 | 82 |
| Thu 11/12 | vs Toledo100 receiving yards · High volume | W 56-28 | — | 13 | 129 | 9.5 | 9.90 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Boston CollegeHigh volume | L 10-31 | — | 8 | 61 | 7.1 | 7.60 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Bowling Green | W 24-10 | — | 5 | 68 | 10 | 13.60 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Western Michigan | W 34-23 | — | 5 | 39 | 11.8 | 7.80 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Eastern Michigan100 receiving yards | W 56-8 | — | 4 | 110 | 19.3 | 27.50 | 1 | 70 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Buffalo100 receiving yards | W 20-13 | — | 6 | 112 | 16.3 | 18.70 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs AkronHigh volume · 2+ TD | W 48-21 | — | 9 | 89 | 11 | 9.90 | 2 | 30 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 32 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Michigan StateHigh volume | W 29-27 | — | 10 | 71 | 6.2 | 7.10 | 1 | 16 |
| Sun 9/6 | @ Arizona | L 6-19 | — | 5 | 23 | 6.8 | 4.60 | 0 | 7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Central Michigan
2007-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
200720072008200820092009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Postseason | Central Michigan | 980 | 63.8 | 28.8 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 980 | 63.8 | 28.8 | 0 |
| 2008 Postseason | Central Michigan | 998 | 67.1 | 29.5 | 18 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 998 | 67.1 | 29.5 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Central Michigan | 1,198 | 67.2 | 32.6 | 200 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 1,198 | 67.2 | 32.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ball State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
170
Primary metric
170 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Eastern Michigan
172
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
172 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Troy
178
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
178 receiving yards with a 91.3 efficiency score.
#4
Akron
174
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
174 receiving yards with a 77.3 efficiency score.
#5
Indiana
138
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
138 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · Central Michigan
1,198 primary output · 67.2 efficiency · 32.6 usage
61.4
#2
2009 Regular Season · Central Michigan
61.4
1,198 primary · 67.2 efficiency · 32.6 usage
#3
2007 Postseason · Central Michigan
58
980 primary · 63.8 efficiency · 28.8 usage
Milestones
10
100+ receiving yards
20
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
3,176
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.