Usage Score
17.7
Player Dossier
2008-2011Toledo
RB • 5'11" • Canton, OH, USA
Morgan Williams leans balanced backfield option traits and 45.3 efficiency.
Usage Score
17.7
Efficiency
45.3
Consistency
52
Season Value
46
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Toledo
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Morgan Williams, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Toledo. Morgan Williams leans balanced backfield option traits and 45.3 efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season
Toledo paired 1,086 primary output with 50.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 45.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Temple
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
62.9
Efficiency
45.3
Usage
17.7
Consistency
52
Best Game by takeover score
Air Force
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Air Force: 0. Unknown: 51. Ohio State: 0. Boise State: 2. Syracuse: 53. Temple: 147. Eastern Michigan: 126. Bowling Green: 136. Miami (OH): 100. Northern Illinois: 9. Western Michigan: 95. Central Michigan: 36
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Air Force: 1 by 0. Unknown: 8 by 58.7. Boise State: 1 by 20.8. Syracuse: 11 by 50.5. Temple: 23 by 64.4. Eastern Michigan: 22 by 47.2. Bowling Green: 19 by 74.6. Miami (OH): 19 by 52.8. Northern Illinois: 7 by 13.4. Western Michigan: 13 by 77.9. Central Michigan: 10 by 37.5
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Temple
Best efficiency game
77.9 vs Western Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/28 | @ Air Force | W 42-41 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Central Michigan | W 44-17 | 10 | 36 | 3.60 | 0 | — | — | 3.6 |
| Wed 11/9 | vs Western Michigan2+ TD | W 66-63 | 10 | 76 | 7.60 | 2 | 3 | 19 | 7.3 |
| Tue 11/1 | vs Northern Illinois | L 60-63 | 7 | 9 | 1.30 | 0 | — | — | 1.3 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Miami (OH)2+ TD | W 49-28 | 17 | 84 | 4.90 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 5.3 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Bowling Green100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 28-21 | 19 | 136 | 7.20 | 3 | — | — | 7.2 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Eastern Michigan2+ TD | W 54-16 | 19 | 71 | 3.70 | 1 | 3 | 55 | 5.7 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Temple100 rush yards | W 36-13 | 20 | 121 | 6.10 | 1 | 3 | 26 | 6.4 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Syracuse2+ TD | L 30-33 | 8 | 39 | 4.90 | 2 | 3 | 14 | 4.8 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Boise State | L 15-40 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | — | — | 2 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Ohio State | L 22-27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Thu 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | 7 | 36 | 5.10 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 6.4 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Toledo
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Toledo | 1,086 | 50.8 | 29.5 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Toledo | 522 | 51.5 | 15.3 | -564 |
| 2010 Postseason | Toledo | 444 | 33.5 | 14.4 | -78 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Toledo | 444 | 33.5 | 14.4 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Toledo | 755 | 45.3 | 17.7 | 311 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Toledo | 755 | 45.3 | 17.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Miami (OH)
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
330
Primary metric
330 scrimmage yards and 48.3 usage.
#2
Eastern Michigan
155
Primary metric
Win with 155 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
155 scrimmage yards and 17.7 usage.
#3
Temple
147
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
147 scrimmage yards and 45.1 usage.
#4
Bowling Green
136
Primary metric
Win with 136 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
136 scrimmage yards and 32.8 usage.
#5
Ball State
109
Primary metric
Win with 109 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
109 scrimmage yards and 28.1 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2008 Regular Season · Toledo
1,086 primary output · 50.8 efficiency · 29.5 usage
53.6
#2
2011 Postseason · Toledo
46
755 primary · 45.3 efficiency · 17.7 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Toledo
46
755 primary · 45.3 efficiency · 17.7 usage
11
100+ rush yards
4
150+ scrimmage yards
6
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,807
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 47 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Morgan Williams quick answers