Usage Score
18.7
Player Dossier
2007-2010Arkansas
TE • 6'2" • Little Rock, AR, USA
D.J. Williams reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
18.7
Efficiency
73.7
Consistency
75.1
Season Value
64.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Arkansas
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
D.J. Williams, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Arkansas. D.J. Williams reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Arkansas paired 627 primary output with 73.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 73.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Mississippi State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
48.2
Efficiency
73.7
Usage
18.7
Consistency
75.1
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 38. Unknown: 68. UL Monroe: 44. Georgia: 61. Alabama: 63. Texas A&M: 23. Auburn: 20. Ole Miss: 55. Vanderbilt: 32. South Carolina: 67. UTEP: 58. Mississippi State: 70. LSU: 28
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 5 by 50.7. Unknown: 5 by 90.7. UL Monroe: 3 by 97.8. Georgia: 6 by 67.8. Alabama: 5 by 84. Texas A&M: 3 by 51.1. Auburn: 4 by 33.3. Ole Miss: 2 by 100. Vanderbilt: 4 by 53.3. South Carolina: 5 by 89.3. UTEP: 5 by 77.3. Mississippi State: 4 by 100. LSU: 3 by 62.2
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Mississippi State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/5 | vs Ohio State | L 26-31 | — | 5 | 38 | 7.6 | 7.60 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/27 | vs LSU | W 31-23 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 11/21 | @ Mississippi State | W 38-31 | — | 4 | 70 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 1 | 32 |
| Sun 11/14 | vs UTEP2+ TD | W 58-21 | — | 5 | 58 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 2 | 32 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ South Carolina | W 41-20 | — | 5 | 67 | 13.4 | 13.40 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/30 | vs Vanderbilt | W 49-14 | — | 4 | 32 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Ole Miss | W 38-24 | — | 2 | 55 | 27.5 | 27.50 | 0 | 46 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Auburn | L 43-65 | — | 4 | 20 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Texas A&M | W 24-17 | — | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Alabama | L 20-24 | — | 5 | 63 | 12.6 | 12.60 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Georgia | W 31-24 | — | 6 | 61 | 10.2 | 10.20 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/11 | @ UL Monroe | W 31-7 | — | 3 | 44 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 68 | 13.6 | 13.60 | 0 | 19 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Arkansas
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Arkansas | 94 | 94.7 | 7.5 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Arkansas | 699 | 70.2 | 26.3 | 605 |
| 2009 Postseason | Arkansas | 411 | 74.8 | 16.7 | -288 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Arkansas | 411 | 74.8 | 16.7 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Arkansas | 627 | 73.7 | 18.7 | 216 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Arkansas | 627 | 73.7 | 18.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Ole Miss
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
129
Primary metric
129 receiving yards with a 86 efficiency score.
#2
South Carolina
137
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
137 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Tulsa
129
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
129 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Mississippi State
70
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UL Monroe
124
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
124 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · Arkansas
627 primary output · 73.7 efficiency · 18.7 usage
64.2
#2
2010 Regular Season · Arkansas
64.2
627 primary · 73.7 efficiency · 18.7 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Arkansas
62
699 primary · 70.2 efficiency · 26.3 usage
4
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,831
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
D.J. Williams quick answers