Usage Score
43.3
Player Profile
Ricky Dobbs
QB • 6'1" • Douglasville, GA, USA
Dual-threat creatorVolume operator
Ricky Dobbs is a dual-threat creator with 43.3 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
66
Consistency
71.6
Season Value
70.2
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Navy
080809091010
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Primary stop by seasons
- Navy
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Navy
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas State
Ricky Dobbs, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Navy. Ricky Dobbs is a dual-threat creator with 43.3 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Navy paired 2,223 primary output with 63.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 66 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas State
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · Navy
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
207.8
Efficiency
66
Usage
43.3
Consistency
71.6
Best Game by takeover score
San Diego State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 254. Maryland: 136. Unknown: 128. Louisiana Tech: 286. Air Force: 146. Wake Forest: 194. SMU: 146. Notre Dame: 161. Duke: 310. East Carolina: 175. Arkansas State: 318. Army: 240
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 39 by 63.2. Maryland: 39 by 60.6. Unknown: 33 by 66.9. Louisiana Tech: 33 by 66. Air Force: 36 by 40.1. Wake Forest: 41 by 51.9. SMU: 28 by 69.3. Notre Dame: 22 by 86.3. Duke: 49 by 64. East Carolina: 25 by 78. Arkansas State: 40 by 84.6. Army: 31 by 61.3
Split Comparison
Wins217.1 · n=7 · +5.6 vs Losses
Losses211.5 · n=4 · -5.6 vs Wins
First Half190.7 · n=6 · -34.3 vs Second Half
Second Half225 · n=6 · +34.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas State
Best efficiency game
86.3 vs Notre Dame
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/24 | @ San Diego StateDual-threat | L 14-35 | 8 | 15 | 147 | 53.3 | 1 | 1 | 63.2 | 24 | 107 | 4.50 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 12/11 | @ ArmyDual-threat | W 31-17 | 6 | 11 | 186 | 54.5 | 2 | 1 | 61.3 | 20 | 54 | 2.70 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Arkansas State3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 35-19 | 8 | 9 | 164 | 88.9 | 1 | 0 | 84.6 | 31 | 154 | 5 | 3 | 17 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ East Carolina3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 76-35 | 6 | 8 | 75 | 75.0 | 2 | 0 | 78 | 17 | 100 | 5.90 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 10/30 | vs Duke3+ TD · Dual-threat | L 31-34 | 13 | 27 | 227 | 48.1 | 2 | 0 | 64 | 22 | 83 | 3.80 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Notre Dame3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 35-17 | 2 | 2 | 71 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | 86.3 | 20 | 90 | 4.50 | 3 | 11 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs SMUDual-threat | W 28-21 | 6 | 9 | 84 | 66.7 | 1 | 0 | 69.3 | 19 | 62 | 3.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Wake Forest3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 28-27 | 8 | 19 | 94 | 42.1 | 2 | 1 | 51.9 | 22 | 100 | 4.50 | 2 | 41 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Air Force | L 6-14 | 6 | 18 | 103 | 33.3 | 0 | 2 | 40.1 | 18 | 43 | 2.40 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Louisiana TechDual-threat | W 37-23 | 8 | 14 | 219 | 57.1 | 1 | 1 | 66 | 19 | 67 | 3.50 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Unknown | — | 5 | 8 | 84 | 62.5 | 0 | 0 | 66.9 | 25 | 44 | 1.80 | 1 | 10 |
| Mon 9/6 | @ MarylandDual-threat | L 14-17 | 6 | 10 | 73 | 60.0 | 0 | 0 | 60.6 | 29 | 63 | 2.20 | 1 | 13 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Navy
2008-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
200820082009200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Postseason | Navy | 707 | 57.1 | 22.3 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Navy | 707 | 57.1 | 22.3 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Navy | 2,223 | 63.8 | 43.3 | 1,516 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Navy | 2,223 | 63.8 | 43.3 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Navy | 2,494 | 66 | 43.3 | 271 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Navy | 2,494 | 66 | 43.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arkansas State
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
318
Primary metric
318 total offense with 84.6 efficiency.
#2
Duke
310
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
310 total offense with 64 efficiency.
#3
Missouri
296
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
296 total offense with 74.3 efficiency.
#4
Western Kentucky
243
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
243 total offense with 82.3 efficiency.
#5
SMU
224
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
224 total offense with 53.3 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · Navy
2,223 primary output · 63.8 efficiency · 43.3 usage
71
#2
2009 Regular Season · Navy
71
2,223 primary · 63.8 efficiency · 43.3 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · Navy
70.2
2,494 primary · 66 efficiency · 43.3 usage
Milestones
5
250+ passing yards
2
300+ total offense
3
3+ takeover TD games
23
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
5,424
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.