Usage / Role
70%
Major offensive role
Player Dossier
2008-2011Michigan State
QB • 6'3" • Holland, MI, USA
Kirk Cousins is a balanced quarterback profile with 9.9 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage / Role
70%
Major offensive role
Impact Production
27
Developing production for a quarterback
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
33
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2011 Postseason · Michigan State
Snapshot
Player Story
Kirk Cousins built his college career from 2008 through 2011 as a quarterback from Holland, MI wearing No. 8, spending time with Michigan State. The clearest part of Kirk Cousins' career was his passing role: 9,131...
Read the storyNFL Draft
Kirk Cousins, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2011 Postseason · Michigan State. Kirk Cousins is a balanced quarterback profile with 9.9 usage in the latest tracked season.
Stat Footprint

Featured Highlight
Kirk Cousins Michigan State Highlights
2011 · Michigan State · Player Highlight
Kirk Cousins college highlights at Michigan State.
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Postseason | Michigan State | 4 | 26 | 36 | -10 | 0 | 34.9 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Michigan State | 4 | 272 | 274 | -2 | 2 | 34.9 |
| 2009 Postseason | Michigan State | 12 | 238 | 220 | 18 | 1 | 62.6 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Michigan State | 12 | 2,502 | 2,460 | 42 | 18 | 62.6 |
| 2010 Postseason | Michigan State | 13 | 64 | 120 | -56 | 0 | 60.5 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Michigan State | 13 | 2,625 | 2,705 | -80 | 21 | 60.5 |
| 2011 Postseason | Michigan State | 14 | 323 | 300 | 23 | 1 | 66.8 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Michigan State | 14 | 2,954 | 3,016 | -62 | 24 | 66.8 |
Related Context
Kirk Cousins played QB for Michigan State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Kirk Cousins recorded 9,131 passing yards, -127 rushing yards, and 2 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2011 with Michigan State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Michigan State paired 3,277 primary output with 61.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 60.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Montana State
Win with 183 yards of offense and 82.8 efficiency. It landed in the 25th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
228.3
Efficiency
60.8
Usage
9.4
Consistency
85.1
Best Game by takeover score
Montana State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas Tech: 238. Montana State: 183. Central Michigan: 159. Notre Dame: 305. Wisconsin: 191. Michigan: 227. Northwestern: 276. Iowa: 202. Minnesota: 235. Western Michigan: 348. Purdue: 211. Penn State: 165
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas Tech: 32 by 55.6. Montana State: 17 by 82.8. Central Michigan: 19 by 62. Notre Dame: 37 by 60.3. Wisconsin: 37 by 46.9. Michigan: 28 by 73.4. Northwestern: 33 by 60.8. Iowa: 37 by 52.1. Minnesota: 36 by 51.2. Western Michigan: 26 by 72. Purdue: 26 by 60.8. Penn State: 31 by 52
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Montana State
Best efficiency game
82.8 vs Montana State
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 1/3 | @ Texas Tech | L 31-41 | 13 | 27 | 220 | 48.1 | 1 | 2 | 55.6 | 5 | 18 | 3.60 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Penn State | L 14-42 | 16 | 28 | 155 | 57.1 | 1 | 2 | 52 | 3 | 10 | 3.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Purdue3+ TD | W 40-37 | 11 | 25 | 208 | 44.0 | 3 | 0 | 60.8 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Western Michigan300-yard game | W 49-14 | 22 | 25 | 353 | 88.0 | 2 | 0 | 72 | 1 | -5 | -5 | 0 | 0 |
| Sun 11/1 | @ Minnesota | L 34-42 | 21 | 35 | 236 | 60.0 | 2 | 1 | 51.2 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Iowa | L 13-15 | 16 | 32 | 225 | 50.0 | 1 | 0 | 52.1 | 5 | -23 | -4.60 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Northwestern | W 24-14 | 21 | 31 | 281 | 67.7 | 2 | 0 | 60.8 | 2 | -5 | -2.50 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs MichiganDual-threat | W 26-20 | 15 | 21 | 152 | 71.4 | 0 | 2 | 73.4 | 7 | 75 | 10.70 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Wisconsin | L 30-38 | 17 | 34 | 201 | 50.0 | 2 | 1 | 46.9 | 3 | -10 | -3.30 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Notre Dame300-yard game | L 30-33 | 23 | 35 | 302 | 65.7 | 1 | 1 | 60.3 | 2 | 3 | 1.50 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Central Michigan | L 27-29 | 13 | 18 | 164 | 72.2 | 1 | 0 | 62 | 1 | -5 | -5 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Montana State3+ TD | W 44-3 | 10 | 17 | 183 | 58.8 | 3 | 0 | 82.8 | — | — | — | — | — |
Player Story
Kirk Cousins built his college career from 2008 through 2011 as a quarterback from Holland, MI wearing No. 8, spending time with Michigan State. The clearest part of Kirk Cousins' career was his passing role: 9,131 passing yards, 66 touchdown passes, and 1,128 attempts across 43 career games in the available record. His career also includes 2 receiving yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. That gives Kirk Cousins' career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan State
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Postseason | Michigan State | 298 | 67.8 | 4 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Michigan State | 298 | 67.8 | 4 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Michigan State | 2,740 | 60.8 | 9.4 | 2,442 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Michigan State | 2,740 | 60.8 | 9.4 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Michigan State | 2,689 | 59 | 10.7 | -51 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Michigan State | 2,689 | 59 | 10.7 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Michigan State | 3,277 | 61.8 | 9.9 | 588 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Michigan State | 3,277 | 61.8 | 9.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs Northern Colorado
Week 4 · W 45-7
Win with 290 yards of offense and 93.3 efficiency.
290
Total Offense
92.5 takeover
290 total offense with 93.3 efficiency.
#2
vs Indiana
Week 12 · W 55-3 · Conference game
272
Total Offense
86.8 takeover
Win with 272 yards of offense and 89.4 efficiency.
272 total offense with 89.4 efficiency.
#3
vs Central Michigan
Week 4 · W 45-7
213
Total Offense
69.9 takeover
Win with 213 yards of offense and 73.9 efficiency.
213 total offense with 73.9 efficiency.
#4
vs Montana State
Week 1 · W 44-3
183
Total Offense
67.7 takeover
Win with 183 yards of offense and 82.8 efficiency.
183 total offense with 82.8 efficiency.
#5
@ Georgia
Week 1 · W 33-30 · Postseason
323
Total Offense
63.4 takeover
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
323 total offense with 59.4 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2011 Postseason · Michigan State
3,277 primary output · 61.8 efficiency · 9.9 usage
66.8
#2
2011 Regular Season · Michigan State
66.8
3,277 primary · 61.8 efficiency · 9.9 usage
#3
2009 Postseason · Michigan State
62.6
2,740 primary · 60.8 efficiency · 9.4 usage
16
250+ passing yards
5
300+ total offense
9
3+ TD games
22
Above avg efficiency
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.