Usage Score
17.7
Player Dossier
2007-2010Northern Illinois
Landon Cox
WR • 6'3" • Calumet City, IL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Landon Cox reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
73.8
Consistency
62.5
Season Value
58.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Northern Illinois
07080809091010
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Northern Illinois
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Landon Cox, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Northern Illinois. Landon Cox reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Northern Illinois paired 535 primary output with 68.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 73.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · Northern Illinois
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
33
Efficiency
73.8
Usage
17.7
Consistency
62.5
Best Game by takeover score
Fresno State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Fresno State: 34. Iowa State: 0. Illinois: 74. Minnesota: 19. Akron: 58. Temple: 52. Buffalo: 41. Central Michigan: 34. Western Michigan: 12. Toledo: 12. Ball State: 60. Eastern Michigan: 23. Miami (OH): 10
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Fresno State: 4 by 56.7. Iowa State: 1 by 0. Illinois: 6 by 82.2. Minnesota: 1 by 100. Akron: 2 by 100. Temple: 5 by 69.3. Buffalo: 3 by 91.1. Central Michigan: 4 by 56.7. Western Michigan: 1 by 80. Toledo: 1 by 80. Ball State: 4 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 2 by 76.7. Miami (OH): 1 by 66.7
Split Comparison
Wins34.5 · n=10 · +6.5 vs Losses
Losses28 · n=3 · -6.5 vs Wins
First Half39.7 · n=7 · +14.5 vs Second Half
Second Half25.2 · n=6 · -14.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Illinois
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ball State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/18 | @ Fresno State | W 40-17 | — | 4 | 34 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 12/4 | @ Miami (OH) | L 21-26 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Fri 11/26 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 71-3 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Ball State | W 59-21 | — | 4 | 60 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 21 |
| Wed 11/10 | vs Toledo | W 65-30 | — | 1 | 12 | 8 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Western Michigan | W 28-21 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Central Michigan | W 33-7 | — | 4 | 34 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Buffalo | W 45-14 | — | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Temple | W 31-17 | — | 5 | 52 | 10.4 | 10.40 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Akron | W 50-14 | — | 2 | 58 | 29 | 29 | 0 | 32 |
| Sun 9/26 | @ Minnesota | W 34-23 | — | 1 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Illinois | L 22-28 | — | 6 | 74 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 1 | 19 |
| Fri 9/3 | @ Iowa State | L 10-27 | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Northern Illinois
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
2007200820082009200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Northern Illinois | 19 | 63.4 | 6.3 | — |
| 2008 Postseason | Northern Illinois | 126 | 48.5 | 12.2 | 107 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Northern Illinois | 126 | 48.5 | 12.2 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Northern Illinois | 535 | 68.8 | 30.6 | 409 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Northern Illinois | 535 | 68.8 | 30.6 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Northern Illinois | 429 | 73.8 | 17.7 | -106 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Northern Illinois | 429 | 73.8 | 17.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Eastern Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
84
Primary metric
84 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Ohio
132
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
132 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#3
Illinois
74
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
74 receiving yards with a 82.2 efficiency score.
#4
Ball State
60
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Tennessee
36
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
36 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · Northern Illinois
535 primary output · 68.8 efficiency · 30.6 usage
63.6
#2
2009 Regular Season · Northern Illinois
63.6
535 primary · 68.8 efficiency · 30.6 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · Northern Illinois
58.6
429 primary · 73.8 efficiency · 17.7 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2007 · Rating 0.7444
Thornton Fractional North · Calumet City, IL
- Committed To
- Northern Illinois
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2007
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,109
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.