Usage Score
13.8
Player Profile
A.J. Whitmore
WR • 5'9" • Nashville, AR, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
A.J. Whitmore reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
54.5
Consistency
44.2
Season Value
37.3
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Tulsa
0707080809
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Primary stop by seasons
- Tulsa
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Tulsa
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Rice
A.J. Whitmore, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Tulsa. A.J. Whitmore reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
Tulsa paired 238 primary output with 54.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 54.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · Tulsa
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
23.8
Efficiency
54.5
Usage
13.8
Consistency
44.2
Best Game by takeover score
Memphis
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tulane: 20. New Mexico: 52. Oklahoma: 14. Unknown: 5. Rice: 72. Boise State: 5. UTEP: 12. SMU: 29. Southern Miss: 5. Memphis: 24
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tulane: 3 by 44.4. New Mexico: 6 by 57.8. Oklahoma: 2 by 46.7. Unknown: 1 by 33.3. Rice: 5 by 96. Boise State: 2 by 16.7. UTEP: 1 by 80. SMU: 1 by 100. Southern Miss: 2 by 16.7. Memphis: 3 by 53.3
Split Comparison
Wins42 · n=4 · +29 vs Losses
Losses13 · n=5 · -29 vs Wins
First Half32.6 · n=5 · +17.6 vs Second Half
Second Half15 · n=5 · -17.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Rice
Best efficiency game
100 vs SMU
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/27 | vs Memphis | W 33-30 | — | 3 | 24 | 6.2 | 8 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 11/22 | @ Southern Miss | L 34-44 | — | 2 | 5 | 2.3 | 2.50 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs SMU | L 13-27 | — | 1 | 29 | 29 | 29 | 0 | 29 |
| Thu 10/22 | @ UTEP | L 24-28 | — | 1 | 12 | 8.8 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Thu 10/15 | vs Boise State | L 21-28 | — | 2 | 5 | 2.5 | 2.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Rice | W 27-10 | — | 5 | 72 | 10.3 | 14.40 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Oklahoma | L 0-45 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 9/13 | @ New Mexico | W 44-10 | — | 6 | 52 | 8.3 | 8.70 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/5 | @ Tulane | W 37-13 | — | 3 | 20 | 2.7 | 6.70 | 0 | 9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulsa
2007-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
20072007200820082009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Postseason | Tulsa | 21 | 38.3 | 4.1 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Tulsa | 21 | 38.3 | 4.1 | 0 |
| 2008 Postseason | Tulsa | 261 | 49.8 | 11 | 240 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Tulsa | 261 | 49.8 | 11 | 0 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Tulsa | 238 | 54.5 | 13.8 | -23 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Rice
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
72
Primary metric
72 receiving yards with a 96 efficiency score.
#2
Marshall
70
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UL Monroe
15
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UAB
63
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 84 efficiency score.
#5
New Mexico
52
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
52 receiving yards with a 57.8 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Regular Season · Tulsa
238 primary output · 54.5 efficiency · 13.8 usage
37.3
#2
2008 Postseason · Tulsa
32.8
261 primary · 49.8 efficiency · 11 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Tulsa
32.8
261 primary · 49.8 efficiency · 11 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
520
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.