Usage Score
23.2
Player Dossier
2008-2011Purdue
Justin Siller
WR • 6'3" • Detroit, MI, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Justin Siller reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
57.8
Consistency
71.7
Season Value
55.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Purdue
0809101111
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Purdue
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Justin Siller, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Purdue. Justin Siller reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season
Purdue paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 57.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · Purdue
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
39.5
Efficiency
57.8
Usage
23.2
Consistency
71.7
Best Game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Michigan: 44. Middle Tennessee: 56. Rice: 21. Unknown: 61. Notre Dame: 26. Minnesota: 8. Penn State: 67. Illinois: 45. Michigan: 58. Wisconsin: 0. Ohio State: 45. Indiana: 43
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Michigan: 5 by 58.7. Middle Tennessee: 5 by 74.7. Rice: 4 by 35. Unknown: 5 by 81.3. Notre Dame: 4 by 43.3. Minnesota: 2 by 26.7. Penn State: 5 by 89.3. Illinois: 3 by 100. Michigan: 5 by 77.3. Wisconsin: 1 by 0. Ohio State: 6 by 50. Indiana: 5 by 57.3
Split Comparison
Wins40.2 · n=6 · +5.8 vs Losses
Losses34.4 · n=5 · -5.8 vs Wins
First Half36 · n=6 · -7 vs Second Half
Second Half43 · n=6 · +7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Penn State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Illinois
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/27 | vs Western Michigan | W 37-32 | — | 5 | 44 | 9.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Indiana | W 33-25 | — | 5 | 43 | 6.4 | 8.60 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Ohio State | W 26-23 | — | 6 | 45 | 7.1 | 7.50 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Wisconsin | L 17-62 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Michigan | L 14-36 | — | 5 | 58 | 8.1 | 11.60 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Illinois | W 21-14 | — | 3 | 45 | 9.7 | 15 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Penn State | L 18-23 | — | 5 | 67 | 13.4 | 13.40 | 0 | 50 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Minnesota | W 45-17 | — | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 10/2 | vs Notre Dame | L 10-38 | — | 4 | 26 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 61 | 12.2 | 12.20 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Rice | L 22-24 | — | 4 | 21 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 27-24 | — | 5 | 56 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 0 | 31 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Purdue
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
20082009201020112011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Purdue | 104 | 59.5 | 14.1 | 104 |
| 2011 Postseason | Purdue | 474 | 57.8 | 23.2 | 370 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Purdue | 474 | 57.8 | 23.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Penn State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
67
Primary metric
67 receiving yards with a 89.3 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
61
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 81.3 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
37
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 82.2 efficiency score.
#4
Michigan
58
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
58 receiving yards with a 77.3 efficiency score.
#5
Illinois
45
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2008 Regular Season · Purdue
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2011 Postseason · Purdue
55.9
474 primary · 57.8 efficiency · 23.2 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Purdue
55.9
474 primary · 57.8 efficiency · 23.2 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
578
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.