Usage Score
25.9
Player Profile
Marquis Maze
WR • 5'10" • Birmingham, AL, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Marquis Maze reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
68.9
Consistency
54.8
Season Value
62.4
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Alabama
08090910101111
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Primary stop by seasons
- Alabama
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Alabama
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Florida
Marquis Maze, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Alabama. Marquis Maze reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Alabama paired 523 primary output with 84.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 68.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · Alabama
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
48.2
Efficiency
68.9
Usage
25.9
Consistency
54.8
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 0. Kent State: 118. Penn State: 42. North Texas: 26. Arkansas: 40. Florida: 36. Vanderbilt: 93. Ole Miss: 21. Tennessee: 106. LSU: 61. Mississippi State: 22. Unknown: 44. Auburn: 18
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kent State: 8 by 98.3. Penn State: 4 by 70. North Texas: 3 by 57.8. Arkansas: 5 by 53.3. Florida: 2 by 100. Vanderbilt: 9 by 68.9. Ole Miss: 3 by 46.7. Tennessee: 5 by 100. LSU: 6 by 67.8. Mississippi State: 4 by 36.7. Unknown: 3 by 97.8. Auburn: 4 by 30
Split Comparison
Wins47.5 · n=11
First Half50.7 · n=7 · +5.4 vs Second Half
Second Half45.3 · n=6 · -5.4 vs First Half
All Games48.2 · n=13
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kent State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Tennessee
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/10 | @ LSU | W 21-0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Auburn | W 42-14 | — | 4 | 18 | 3.8 | 4.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 44 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Mississippi State | W 24-7 | — | 4 | 22 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 11/6 | vs LSU | L 6-9 | — | 6 | 61 | 7.9 | 10.20 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Tennessee100 receiving yards | W 37-6 | — | 5 | 106 | 17.5 | 21.20 | 0 | 69 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Ole Miss | W 52-7 | — | 3 | 21 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs VanderbiltHigh volume | W 34-0 | — | 9 | 93 | 9.2 | 10.30 | 0 | 29 |
| Sun 10/2 | @ Florida | W 38-10 | — | 2 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Arkansas | W 38-14 | — | 5 | 40 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs North Texas | W 41-0 | — | 3 | 26 | 8 | 8.70 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Penn State | W 27-11 | — | 4 | 42 | 7.4 | 10.50 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Kent State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 48-7 | — | 8 | 118 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 1 | 26 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Alabama
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
2008200920092010201020112011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Alabama | 137 | 72.8 | 13.5 | — |
| 2009 Postseason | Alabama | 523 | 84.1 | 21.5 | 386 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Alabama | 523 | 84.1 | 21.5 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Alabama | 557 | 85.6 | 15.4 | 34 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Alabama | 557 | 85.6 | 15.4 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Alabama | 627 | 68.9 | 25.9 | 70 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Alabama | 627 | 68.9 | 25.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Florida
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
96
Primary metric
96 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Kent State
118
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
118 receiving yards with a 98.3 efficiency score.
#3
Mississippi State
89
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
LSU
88
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
#5
Tennessee
106
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · Alabama
523 primary output · 84.1 efficiency · 21.5 usage
63.7
#2
2009 Regular Season · Alabama
63.7
523 primary · 84.1 efficiency · 21.5 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · Alabama
62.4
557 primary · 85.6 efficiency · 15.4 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.79
Morton Ranch · Katy, TX
- Committed To
- Air Force
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,844
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.