Usage Score
14.3
Player Dossier
2009-2011Rice
Nick Fanuzzi
QB • 6'4" • San Antonio, TX, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Nick Fanuzzi is a balanced quarterback profile with 14.3 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
53.9
Consistency
38.1
Season Value
44.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Rice
091011
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Rice
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Nick Fanuzzi, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Rice. Nick Fanuzzi is a balanced quarterback profile with 14.3 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Rice paired 1,694 primary output with 56.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 53.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2011 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Win with 439 yards of offense and 76.2 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Regular Season · Rice
Games
8
Primary Metric / G
149.4
Efficiency
53.9
Usage
14.3
Consistency
38.1
Best Game by takeover score
SMU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Southern Miss: 53. Marshall: 8. Tulsa: 233. Houston: 88. UTEP: 439. Northwestern: 106. Tulane: 56. SMU: 212
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Southern Miss: 15 by 47.4. Marshall: 6 by 37. Tulsa: 45 by 51.7. Houston: 17 by 54.3. UTEP: 49 by 76.2. Northwestern: 28 by 53.3. Tulane: 29 by 49. SMU: 46 by 62.1
Split Comparison
Wins247.5 · n=2 · +130.8 vs Losses
Losses116.7 · n=6 · -130.8 vs Wins
First Half95.5 · n=4 · -107.8 vs Second Half
Second Half203.3 · n=4 · +107.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
UTEP
Best efficiency game
76.2 vs UTEP
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | @ SMUDual-threat | L 24-27 | 22 | 38 | 159 | 57.9 | 2 | 1 | 62.1 | 8 | 53 | 6.60 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Tulane | W 19-7 | 16 | 24 | 85 | 66.7 | 0 | 0 | 49 | 5 | -29 | -5.80 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Northwestern | L 6-28 | 13 | 25 | 92 | 52.0 | 0 | 1 | 53.3 | 3 | 14 | 4.70 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs UTEP300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 41-37 | 30 | 43 | 405 | 69.8 | 3 | 0 | 76.2 | 6 | 34 | 5.70 | 0 | 14 |
| Fri 10/28 | @ Houston | L 34-73 | 3 | 9 | 81 | 33.3 | 1 | 0 | 54.3 | 8 | 7 | 0.90 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Tulsa | L 20-38 | 20 | 37 | 234 | 54.1 | 1 | 0 | 51.7 | 8 | -1 | -0.10 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Marshall | L 20-24 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 25.0 | 0 | 0 | 37 | 2 | -3 | -1.50 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Southern Miss | L 24-48 | 7 | 13 | 56 | 53.8 | 0 | 0 | 47.4 | 2 | -3 | -1.50 | 0 | 2 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rice
2009-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
200920102011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Rice | 1,597 | 52.3 | 11.8 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Rice | 1,694 | 56.3 | 17.8 | 97 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Rice | 1,195 | 53.9 | 14.3 | -499 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UTEP
Win with 439 yards of offense and 76.2 efficiency.
439
Primary metric
439 total offense with 76.2 efficiency.
#2
SMU
282
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
282 total offense with 50.4 efficiency.
#3
Oklahoma State
224
Primary metric
Loss with 224 yards of offense and 74.3 efficiency.
224 total offense with 74.3 efficiency.
#4
Houston
235
Primary metric
Win with 235 yards of offense and 68.7 efficiency.
235 total offense with 68.7 efficiency.
#5
East Carolina
230
Primary metric
Loss with 230 yards of offense and 48.4 efficiency.
230 total offense with 48.4 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Rice
1,694 primary output · 56.3 efficiency · 17.8 usage
62
#2
2009 Regular Season · Rice
57.7
1,597 primary · 52.3 efficiency · 11.8 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Rice
44.1
1,195 primary · 53.9 efficiency · 14.3 usage
Milestones
2
250+ passing yards
1
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
7
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
4,486
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.