Usage Score
17.9
Player Dossier
2008-2011Houston
WR • 6'1" • Richardson, TX, USA
Justin Johnson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
17.9
Efficiency
88.1
Consistency
73.7
Season Value
69.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Houston
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Justin Johnson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Houston. Justin Johnson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Houston paired 1,229 primary output with 88.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 88.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Southern Miss
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
87.8
Efficiency
88.1
Usage
17.9
Consistency
73.7
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 148. UCLA: 18. North Texas: 87. Louisiana Tech: 100. Unknown: 83. UTEP: 69. East Carolina: 51. Marshall: 54. Rice: 56. UAB: 91. Tulane: 96. SMU: 99. Tulsa: 106. Southern Miss: 171
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 12 by 82.2. UCLA: 2 by 60. North Texas: 4 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 5 by 100. Unknown: 6 by 92.2. UTEP: 7 by 65.7. East Carolina: 4 by 85. Marshall: 3 by 100. Rice: 4 by 93.3. UAB: 7 by 86.7. Tulane: 5 by 100. SMU: 9 by 73.3. Tulsa: 7 by 100. Southern Miss: 12 by 95
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Southern Miss
Best efficiency game
100 vs Tulsa
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/2 | @ Penn State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 30-14 | — | 12 | 148 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 12/3 | vs Southern Miss100 receiving yards · High volume | L 28-49 | — | 12 | 171 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 2 | 50 |
| Fri 11/25 | @ Tulsa100 receiving yards | W 48-16 | — | 7 | 106 | 15.1 | 15.10 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs SMUHigh volume | W 37-7 | — | 9 | 99 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 38 |
| Fri 11/11 | @ Tulane | W 73-17 | — | 5 | 96 | 19.2 | 19.20 | 0 | 61 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ UAB | W 56-13 | — | 7 | 91 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 26 |
| Fri 10/28 | vs Rice | W 73-34 | — | 4 | 56 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Marshall | W 63-28 | — | 3 | 54 | 18 | 18 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs East Carolina | W 56-3 | — | 4 | 51 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 0 | 21 |
| Fri 9/30 | @ UTEP | W 49-42 | — | 7 | 69 | 9.9 | 9.90 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 9/25 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | — | 6 | 83 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 2 | 29 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Louisiana Tech100 receiving yards | W 35-34 | — | 5 | 100 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 55 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ North Texas2+ TD | W 48-23 | — | 4 | 87 | 21.8 | 21.80 | 2 | 32 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs UCLA | W 38-34 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 12 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Houston
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Houston | 50 | 66.6 | 3.2 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Houston | 105 | 57.4 | 4.4 | 55 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Houston | 240 | 79.3 | 7.6 | 135 |
| 2011 Postseason | Houston | 1,229 | 88.1 | 17.9 | 989 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Houston | 1,229 | 88.1 | 17.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Southern Miss
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
171
Primary metric
171 receiving yards with a 95 efficiency score.
#2
Southern Miss
68
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Tulsa
14
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
14 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#4
Penn State
148
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
148 receiving yards with a 82.2 efficiency score.
#5
Texas Tech
63
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 84 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · Houston
1,229 primary output · 88.1 efficiency · 17.9 usage
69.9
#2
2011 Regular Season · Houston
69.9
1,229 primary · 88.1 efficiency · 17.9 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Houston
38.1
240 primary · 79.3 efficiency · 7.6 usage
4
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2007 · Rating 0.8267
Berkner · Richardson, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,624
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Justin Johnson quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit