Usage Score
20.6
Player Dossier
2008-2011Houston
WR • 5'8" • Houston, TX, USA
Tyron Carrier reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
20.6
Efficiency
66.8
Consistency
69.2
Season Value
60.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · Houston
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tyron Carrier, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · Houston. Tyron Carrier reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason
Houston paired 1,026 primary output with 79.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 66.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UCLA
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
68.4
Efficiency
66.8
Usage
20.6
Consistency
69.2
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 44. UCLA: 138. North Texas: 63. Louisiana Tech: 35. Unknown: 90. UTEP: 77. East Carolina: 53. Marshall: 97. Rice: 85. UAB: 105. Tulane: 28. SMU: 34. Tulsa: 68. Southern Miss: 41
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 9 by 32.6. UCLA: 10 by 92. North Texas: 5 by 84. Louisiana Tech: 7 by 33.3. Unknown: 5 by 100. UTEP: 5 by 100. East Carolina: 7 by 50.5. Marshall: 7 by 92.4. Rice: 7 by 81. UAB: 12 by 58.3. Tulane: 4 by 46.7. SMU: 5 by 45.3. Tulsa: 9 by 50.4. Southern Miss: 4 by 68.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UCLA
Best efficiency game
100 vs UTEP
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/2 | @ Penn StateHigh volume | W 30-14 | — | 9 | 44 | 4.9 | 4.90 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 12/3 | vs Southern Miss | L 28-49 | — | 4 | 41 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Fri 11/25 | @ TulsaHigh volume | W 48-16 | — | 9 | 68 | 7.6 | 7.60 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs SMU | W 37-7 | — | 5 | 34 | 5.8 | 6.80 | 0 | 20 |
| Fri 11/11 | @ Tulane | W 73-17 | — | 4 | 28 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ UAB100 receiving yards · High volume | W 56-13 | — | 12 | 105 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 1 | 15 |
| Fri 10/28 | vs Rice | W 73-34 | — | 7 | 85 | 12.1 | 12.10 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Marshall | W 63-28 | — | 7 | 97 | 13.9 | 13.90 | 1 | 43 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs East Carolina | W 56-3 | — | 7 | 53 | 7.6 | 7.60 | 1 | 27 |
| Fri 9/30 | @ UTEP | W 49-42 | — | 5 | 77 | 15.4 | 15.40 | 0 | 25 |
| Sun 9/25 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 90 | 16 | 18 | 0 | 54 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Louisiana Tech | W 35-34 | — | 7 | 35 | 5.4 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ North Texas | W 48-23 | — | 5 | 63 | 12.6 | 12.60 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs UCLA100 receiving yards · High volume | W 38-34 | — | 10 | 138 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 1 | 26 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Houston
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Postseason | Houston | 1,026 | 79.8 | 19.8 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Houston | 1,026 | 79.8 | 19.8 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Houston | 1,029 | 72.9 | 17.1 | 3 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Houston | 1,029 | 72.9 | 17.1 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Houston | 480 | 58.3 | 17.3 | -549 |
| 2011 Postseason | Houston | 958 | 66.8 | 20.6 | 478 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Houston | 958 | 66.8 | 20.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
UCF
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
149
Primary metric
149 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UCLA
138
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
138 receiving yards with a 92 efficiency score.
#3
UTEP
141
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
141 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Tulsa
127
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
127 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Texas Tech
95
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
95 receiving yards with a 79.2 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2008 Postseason · Houston
1,026 primary output · 79.8 efficiency · 19.8 usage
65.4
#2
2008 Regular Season · Houston
65.4
1,026 primary · 79.8 efficiency · 19.8 usage
#3
2009 Postseason · Houston
61.6
1,029 primary · 72.9 efficiency · 17.1 usage
11
100+ receiving yards
14
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
3,493
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 53 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Tyron Carrier quick answers