Usage Score
12.6
Player Dossier
2008-2011UTEP
Donavon Kemp
WR • 6'1" • DeSoto, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Donavon Kemp reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
86.7
Consistency
50.5
Season Value
62.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · UTEP
08091011
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kansas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Donavon Kemp, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · UTEP. Donavon Kemp reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
UTEP paired 456 primary output with 86.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 86.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2011 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
45.6
Efficiency
86.7
Usage
12.6
Consistency
50.5
Best Game by takeover score
UCF
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 114. SMU: 92. New Mexico State: 5. South Florida: 14. Houston: 53. Colorado State: 34. Rice: 26. East Carolina: 38. Tulsa: 6. UCF: 74
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 4 by 100. SMU: 6 by 100. New Mexico State: 1 by 33.3. South Florida: 1 by 93.3. Houston: 3 by 100. Colorado State: 2 by 100. Rice: 1 by 100. East Carolina: 2 by 100. Tulsa: 1 by 40. UCF: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins25.7 · n=3 · -18.5 vs Losses
Losses44.2 · n=6 · +18.5 vs Wins
First Half55.6 · n=5 · +20 vs Second Half
Second Half35.6 · n=5 · -20 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs UCF
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | @ UCF | L 14-31 | — | 2 | 74 | 37 | 37 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Tulsa | L 28-57 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 11/13 | vs East Carolina | W 22-17 | — | 2 | 38 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Rice | L 37-41 | — | 1 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 0 | 26 |
| Sun 10/23 | vs Colorado State | W 31-17 | — | 2 | 34 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| Fri 9/30 | vs Houston | L 42-49 | — | 3 | 53 | 17.7 | 17.70 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ South Florida | L 24-52 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 9/18 | @ New Mexico State | W 16-10 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ SMU | L 17-28 | — | 6 | 92 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 0 | 37 |
| Sun 9/4 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards | — | — | 4 | 114 | 28.5 | 28.50 | 1 | 46 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
2008200920102011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | UTEP | 142 | 90 | 8.5 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | UTEP | 284 | 82.4 | 8.8 | 142 |
| 2010 Regular Season | UTEP | 181 | 71.7 | 13.4 | -103 |
| 2011 Regular Season | UTEP | 456 | 86.7 | 12.6 | 275 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kansas
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
85
Primary metric
85 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
114
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
114 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Tulane
66
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
66 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
SMU
92
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
92 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Tulsa
80
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
80 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Regular Season · UTEP
456 primary output · 86.7 efficiency · 12.6 usage
62.3
#2
2010 Regular Season · UTEP
49.4
181 primary · 71.7 efficiency · 13.4 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · UTEP
48.8
284 primary · 82.4 efficiency · 8.8 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,063
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.