Usage Score
12.5
Player Dossier
2008-2011UTEP
Vernon Frazier
RB • 5'6" • Duncanville, TX, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Vernon Frazier leans balanced backfield option traits and 51.8 efficiency.
Efficiency
51.8
Consistency
50.9
Season Value
53.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · UTEP
0809101011
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Colorado State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Vernon Frazier, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · UTEP. Vernon Frazier leans balanced backfield option traits and 51.8 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
UTEP paired 490 primary output with 51.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 51.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2011 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Colorado State
Win with 167 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
40.8
Efficiency
51.8
Usage
12.5
Consistency
50.9
Best Game by takeover score
UCF
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 45. SMU: 10. New Mexico State: 21. South Florida: -2. Houston: 18. Tulane: 44. Colorado State: 167. Southern Miss: 37. Rice: 50. East Carolina: 57. Tulsa: 40. UCF: 3
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 7 by 45.5. SMU: 5 by 17.7. New Mexico State: 7 by 27.1. South Florida: 4 by 12.5. Houston: 3 by 62.5. Tulane: 7 by 65.5. Colorado State: 7 by 100. Southern Miss: 9 by 39. Rice: 8 by 72.5. East Carolina: 8 by 76.1. Tulsa: 3 by 100. UCF: 6 by 3.6
Split Comparison
Wins72.3 · n=4 · +50.0 vs Losses
Losses22.3 · n=7 · -50.0 vs Wins
First Half22.7 · n=6 · -36.3 vs Second Half
Second Half59 · n=6 · +36.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Colorado State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Tulsa
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | @ UCF | L 14-31 | 4 | 1 | 0.30 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.5 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Tulsa | L 28-57 | 3 | 40 | 13.30 | 0 | — | — | 13.3 |
| Sun 11/13 | vs East Carolina | W 22-17 | 7 | 52 | 7.40 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 7.1 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Rice | L 37-41 | 7 | 52 | 7.40 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 6.3 |
| Sun 10/30 | vs Southern Miss | L 13-31 | 6 | 21 | 3.50 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 4.1 |
| Sun 10/23 | vs Colorado State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 31-17 | 7 | 167 | 23.90 | 2 | — | — | 23.9 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Tulane | W 44-7 | 7 | 44 | 6.30 | 1 | — | — | 6.3 |
| Fri 9/30 | vs Houston | L 42-49 | 3 | 18 | 6 | 0 | — | — | 6 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ South Florida | L 24-52 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | -6 | -0.5 |
| Sun 9/18 | @ New Mexico State | W 16-10 | 6 | 14 | 2.30 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 3 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ SMU | L 17-28 | 4 | 6 | 1.50 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 |
| Sun 9/4 | vs Unknown | — | 5 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 30 | 6.4 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
20082009201020102011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | UTEP | 174 | 31.9 | 6.6 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | UTEP | 25 | 22.2 | 12.3 | -149 |
| 2010 Postseason | UTEP | 305 | 50.9 | 7.5 | 280 |
| 2010 Regular Season | UTEP | 305 | 50.9 | 7.5 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | UTEP | 490 | 51.8 | 12.5 | 185 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Colorado State
Win with 167 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
167
Primary metric
167 scrimmage yards and 15.9 usage.
#2
Unknown
91
Primary metric
Game with 91 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
91 scrimmage yards and 12.3 usage.
#3
UCF
73
Primary metric
Win with 73 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
73 scrimmage yards and 8.2 usage.
#4
New Mexico State
74
Primary metric
Loss with 74 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
74 scrimmage yards and 23.7 usage.
#5
Memphis
46
Primary metric
Win with 46 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
46 scrimmage yards and 8.7 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Regular Season · UTEP
490 primary output · 51.8 efficiency · 12.5 usage
53.6
#2
2010 Postseason · UTEP
40.1
305 primary · 50.9 efficiency · 7.5 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · UTEP
40.1
305 primary · 50.9 efficiency · 7.5 usage
Milestones
1
100+ rush yards
1
150+ scrimmage yards
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
994
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.