Usage Score
30.2
Player Dossier
2008-2011Wisconsin
Nick Toon
WR • 6'3" • Middleton, WI, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Nick Toon reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
84.3
Consistency
69.6
Season Value
71
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Wisconsin
0808090910101111
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Wisconsin
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Nick Toon, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Wisconsin. Nick Toon reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Wisconsin paired 926 primary output with 84.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 84.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · Wisconsin
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
71.2
Efficiency
84.3
Usage
30.2
Consistency
69.6
Best Game by takeover score
Oregon
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oregon: 104. UNLV: 54. Oregon State: 69. Northern Illinois: 75. Unknown: 155. Nebraska: 94. Michigan State: 58. Ohio State: 39. Purdue: 35. Minnesota: 100. Illinois: 67. Penn State: 42. Michigan State: 34
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oregon: 9 by 77. UNLV: 2 by 100. Oregon State: 7 by 65.7. Northern Illinois: 5 by 100. Unknown: 7 by 100. Nebraska: 4 by 100. Michigan State: 2 by 100. Ohio State: 3 by 86.7. Purdue: 3 by 77.8. Minnesota: 8 by 83.3. Illinois: 6 by 74.4. Penn State: 5 by 56. Michigan State: 3 by 75.6
Split Comparison
Wins63.3 · n=9 · -3.7 vs Losses
Losses67 · n=3 · +3.7 vs Wins
First Half87 · n=7 · +34.2 vs Second Half
Second Half52.8 · n=6 · -34.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Michigan State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/2 | @ Oregon100 receiving yards · High volume | L 38-45 | — | 9 | 104 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 1 | 33 |
| Sun 12/4 | @ Michigan State | W 42-39 | — | 3 | 34 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Penn State | W 45-7 | — | 5 | 42 | 8.4 | 8.40 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Illinois | W 28-17 | — | 6 | 67 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Minnesota100 receiving yards · High volume | W 42-13 | — | 8 | 100 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 2 | 21 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Purdue | W 62-17 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 10/30 | @ Ohio State | L 29-33 | — | 3 | 39 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 19 |
| Sun 10/23 | @ Michigan State | L 31-37 | — | 2 | 58 | 29 | 29 | 0 | 42 |
| Sun 10/2 | vs Nebraska | W 48-17 | — | 4 | 94 | 23.5 | 23.50 | 1 | 46 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | — | — | 7 | 155 | 22.1 | 22.10 | 2 | 59 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Northern Illinois2+ TD | W 49-7 | — | 5 | 75 | 15 | 15 | 2 | 19 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Oregon State | W 35-0 | — | 7 | 69 | 9.9 | 9.90 | 1 | 17 |
| Fri 9/2 | vs UNLV | W 51-17 | — | 2 | 54 | 27 | 27 | 0 | 39 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Wisconsin
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
20082008200920092010201020112011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Postseason | Wisconsin | 257 | 94 | 15.9 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 257 | 94 | 15.9 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Wisconsin | 805 | 87.7 | 26.2 | 548 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 805 | 87.7 | 26.2 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Wisconsin | 459 | 83.4 | 28.1 | -346 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 459 | 83.4 | 28.1 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Wisconsin | 926 | 84.3 | 30.2 | 467 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 926 | 84.3 | 30.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Indiana
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
123
Primary metric
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
155
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
155 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Ohio State
72
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
72 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#4
Michigan State
44
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
#5
Indiana
41
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 91.1 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · Wisconsin
926 primary output · 84.3 efficiency · 30.2 usage
71
#2
2011 Regular Season · Wisconsin
71
926 primary · 84.3 efficiency · 30.2 usage
#3
2009 Postseason · Wisconsin
70
805 primary · 87.7 efficiency · 26.2 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.7983
Carmel · Carmel, IN
- Committed To
- Kent State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,447
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.