Usage Score
18.3
Player Dossier
2008-2009Oregon State
Damola Adeniji
WR • 6'3" • Eugene, OR, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Damola Adeniji reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
90
Consistency
72.6
Season Value
70.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Oregon State
080909
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Oregon State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: BYU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Damola Adeniji, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Oregon State. Damola Adeniji reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Oregon State paired 807 primary output with 90 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 90 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: BYU
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Postseason · Oregon State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
62.1
Efficiency
90
Usage
18.3
Consistency
72.6
Best Game by takeover score
BYU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. BYU: 106. Unknown: 45. UNLV: 26. Cincinnati: 57. Arizona: 70. Arizona State: 83. Stanford: 60. USC: 81. UCLA: 39. California: 87. Washington: 35. Washington State: 89. Oregon: 29
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. BYU: 8 by 88.3. Unknown: 3 by 100. UNLV: 2 by 86.7. Cincinnati: 5 by 76. Arizona: 6 by 77.8. Arizona State: 5 by 100. Stanford: 5 by 80. USC: 5 by 100. UCLA: 3 by 86.7. California: 5 by 100. Washington: 3 by 77.8. Washington State: 5 by 100. Oregon: 2 by 96.7
Split Comparison
Wins59.9 · n=7 · -8.7 vs Losses
Losses68.6 · n=5 · +8.7 vs Wins
First Half63.9 · n=7 · +3.9 vs Second Half
Second Half60 · n=6 · -3.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
BYU
Best efficiency game
100 vs Washington State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/23 | @ BYU100 receiving yards · High volume | L 20-44 | — | 8 | 106 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 1 | 31 |
| Fri 12/4 | @ Oregon | L 33-37 | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ Washington State | W 42-10 | — | 5 | 89 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs Washington | W 48-21 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 11/8 | @ California | W 31-14 | — | 5 | 87 | 17.4 | 17.40 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs UCLA | W 26-19 | — | 3 | 39 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 19 |
| Sun 10/25 | @ USC | L 36-42 | — | 5 | 81 | 16.2 | 16.20 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Stanford | W 38-28 | — | 5 | 60 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Arizona State | W 28-17 | — | 5 | 83 | 16.6 | 16.60 | 1 | 41 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Arizona | L 32-37 | — | 6 | 70 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Cincinnati | L 18-28 | — | 5 | 57 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 9/13 | @ UNLV | W 23-21 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 45 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 16 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oregon State
2008-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
200820092009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Oregon State | 39 | 100 | 7.7 | — |
| 2009 Postseason | Oregon State | 807 | 90 | 18.3 | 768 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Oregon State | 807 | 90 | 18.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
BYU
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
106
Primary metric
106 receiving yards with a 88.3 efficiency score.
#2
Washington State
39
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Arizona State
83
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Washington State
89
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
California
87
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
87 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · Oregon State
807 primary output · 90 efficiency · 18.3 usage
70.2
#2
2009 Regular Season · Oregon State
70.2
807 primary · 90 efficiency · 18.3 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Oregon State
53.3
39 primary · 100 efficiency · 7.7 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
846
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 14 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.