Usage Score
35.9
Player Dossier
2008-2011Iowa
Marvin McNutt
WR • 6'4" • St. Louis, MO, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Marvin McNutt reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
90.9
Consistency
75.9
Season Value
75.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Iowa
08090910101111
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Iowa
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Marvin McNutt, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Iowa. Marvin McNutt reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Iowa paired 1,315 primary output with 90.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 90.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · Iowa
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
101.2
Efficiency
90.9
Usage
35.9
Consistency
75.9
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 46. Unknown: 140. Iowa State: 61. Pittsburgh: 112. UL Monroe: 100. Penn State: 73. Northwestern: 87. Indiana: 184. Minnesota: 101. Michigan: 101. Michigan State: 130. Purdue: 151. Nebraska: 29
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 4 by 76.7. Unknown: 6 by 100. Iowa State: 4 by 100. Pittsburgh: 8 by 93.3. UL Monroe: 7 by 95.2. Penn State: 4 by 100. Northwestern: 6 by 96.7. Indiana: 6 by 100. Minnesota: 7 by 96.2. Michigan: 9 by 74.8. Michigan State: 8 by 100. Purdue: 9 by 100. Nebraska: 4 by 48.3
Split Comparison
Wins122.5 · n=6 · +49.2 vs Losses
Losses73.3 · n=6 · -49.2 vs Wins
First Half88.4 · n=7 · -27.6 vs Second Half
Second Half116 · n=6 · +27.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Indiana
Best efficiency game
100 vs Purdue
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/31 | @ Oklahoma | L 14-31 | — | 4 | 46 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Fri 11/25 | @ Nebraska | L 7-20 | — | 4 | 29 | 5.8 | 7.30 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Purdue100 receiving yards · High volume | W 31-21 | — | 9 | 151 | 15.6 | 16.80 | 2 | 51 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Michigan State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 21-37 | — | 8 | 130 | 15.7 | 16.30 | 1 | 48 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Michigan100 receiving yards · High volume | W 24-16 | — | 9 | 101 | 10.8 | 11.20 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Minnesota100 receiving yards | L 21-22 | — | 7 | 101 | 15 | 14.40 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Indiana100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 45-24 | — | 6 | 184 | 30.7 | 30.70 | 3 | 80 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Northwestern | W 41-31 | — | 6 | 87 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Penn State | L 3-13 | — | 4 | 73 | 18.3 | 18.30 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs UL Monroe100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 45-17 | — | 7 | 100 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 2 | 22 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Pittsburgh100 receiving yards · High volume | W 31-27 | — | 8 | 112 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 43 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Iowa State | L 41-44 | — | 4 | 61 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | — | — | 6 | 140 | 23.3 | 23.30 | 2 | 88 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Iowa
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
2008200920092010201020112011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Iowa | 11 | 73.3 | 7.7 | — |
| 2009 Postseason | Iowa | 674 | 85.7 | 18.4 | 663 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Iowa | 674 | 85.7 | 18.4 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Iowa | 861 | 87.2 | 23.1 | 187 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Iowa | 861 | 87.2 | 23.1 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Iowa | 1,315 | 90.9 | 35.9 | 454 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Iowa | 1,315 | 90.9 | 35.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Indiana
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
184
Primary metric
184 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Indiana
155
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
155 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Indiana
126
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
126 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Purdue
151
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
151 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
140
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
140 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · Iowa
1,315 primary output · 90.9 efficiency · 35.9 usage
75.2
#2
2011 Regular Season · Iowa
75.2
1,315 primary · 90.9 efficiency · 35.9 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · Iowa
62.5
861 primary · 87.2 efficiency · 23.1 usage
Milestones
11
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
6
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.79
Lourdes · Oshkosh, WI
- Committed To
- Wisconsin
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,861
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.