Usage Score
15.3
Player Dossier
2009-2010Memphis
Jermaine McKenzie
WR • 6'2" • Bradenton, FL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jermaine McKenzie reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
82.7
Consistency
63.8
Season Value
65.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Memphis
0910
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Memphis
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Marshall
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jermaine McKenzie, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Memphis. Jermaine McKenzie reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Memphis paired 409 primary output with 82.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 82.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2010 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Marshall
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Regular Season · Memphis
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
40.9
Efficiency
82.7
Usage
15.3
Consistency
63.8
Best Game by takeover score
UCF
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Mississippi State: 45. East Carolina: 40. Middle Tennessee: 37. UTEP: 15. Tulsa: 6. Louisville: 71. Tennessee: 37. Marshall: 109. UAB: 45. UCF: 4
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Mississippi State: 5 by 60. East Carolina: 2 by 100. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 100. UTEP: 1 by 100. Tulsa: 1 by 40. Louisville: 3 by 100. Tennessee: 2 by 100. Marshall: 6 by 100. UAB: 2 by 100. UCF: 1 by 26.7
Split Comparison
Losses41.3 · n=9
First Half28.6 · n=5 · -24.6 vs Second Half
Second Half53.2 · n=5 · +24.6 vs First Half
All Games40.9 · n=10
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Marshall
Best efficiency game
100 vs UAB
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/27 | vs UCF | L 17-37 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ UAB | L 15-31 | — | 2 | 45 | 22.5 | 22.50 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 11/13 | @ Marshall100 receiving yards | L 13-28 | — | 6 | 109 | 18.2 | 18.20 | 1 | 43 |
| Sun 11/7 | vs Tennessee | L 14-50 | — | 2 | 37 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Louisville | L 0-56 | — | 3 | 71 | 23.7 | 23.70 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Tulsa | L 7-48 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 9/26 | @ UTEP | L 13-16 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 24-17 | — | 2 | 37 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 9/11 | @ East Carolina | L 27-49 | — | 2 | 40 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 9/4 | @ Mississippi State | L 7-49 | — | 5 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 20 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Memphis
2009-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
20092010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Memphis | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Memphis | 409 | 82.7 | 15.3 | 409 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Marshall
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
109
Primary metric
109 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Louisville
71
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
71 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UAB
45
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Middle Tennessee
37
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
East Carolina
40
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
40 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Memphis
409 primary output · 82.7 efficiency · 15.3 usage
65.2
#2
2009 Regular Season · Memphis
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.8
Monroe · Monroe, WA
- Committed To
- Washington State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
409
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 10 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.