Usage Score
36.7
Player Dossier
2007-2010Oklahoma State
Kendall Hunter
RB • 5'8" • Tyler, TX, USA
Workhorse runnerSteady chain mover
Kendall Hunter leans workhorse runner traits and 55.7 efficiency.
Efficiency
55.7
Consistency
74.2
Season Value
65.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · Oklahoma State
0707080809091010
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Oklahoma State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Washington State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kendall Hunter, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · Oklahoma State. Kendall Hunter leans workhorse runner traits and 55.7 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason
Oklahoma State paired 1,753 primary output with 67.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 55.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Washington State
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · Oklahoma State
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
126.8
Efficiency
55.7
Usage
36.7
Consistency
74.2
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 27. Washington State: 253. Troy: 172. Tulsa: 88. Texas A&M: 102. Louisiana: 126. Texas Tech: 133. Nebraska: 201. Kansas State: 143. Baylor: 75. Texas: 153. Kansas: 117. Oklahoma: 59
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 11 by 30.2. Washington State: 24 by 93.9. Troy: 33 by 56.8. Tulsa: 14 by 59.7. Texas A&M: 23 by 47.2. Louisiana: 28 by 46.9. Texas Tech: 27 by 53. Nebraska: 26 by 80.5. Kansas State: 28 by 53.2. Baylor: 16 by 49. Texas: 24 by 58.1. Kansas: 23 by 51. Oklahoma: 14 by 44
Split Comparison
Wins126.3 · n=11 · -3.7 vs Losses
Losses130 · n=2 · +3.7 vs Wins
First Half128.7 · n=7 · +4.0 vs Second Half
Second Half124.7 · n=6 · -4.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Washington State
Best efficiency game
93.9 vs Washington State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/30 | @ Arizona | W 36-10 | 10 | 32 | 3.20 | 0 | 1 | -5 | 2.5 |
| Sun 11/28 | vs Oklahoma | L 41-47 | 13 | 55 | 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4.2 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Kansas100 rush yards | W 48-14 | 22 | 105 | 4.80 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 5.1 |
| Sun 11/14 | @ Texas100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 33-16 | 23 | 116 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 37 | 6.4 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Baylor2+ TD | W 55-28 | 14 | 66 | 4.70 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 4.7 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Kansas State100 rush yards | W 24-14 | 28 | 143 | 5.10 | 0 | — | — | 5.1 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Nebraska100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 41-51 | 26 | 201 | 7.70 | 2 | — | — | 7.7 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Texas Tech100 rush yards | W 34-17 | 25 | 130 | 5.20 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4.9 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Louisiana100 rush yards | W 54-28 | 28 | 126 | 4.50 | 1 | — | — | 4.5 |
| Thu 9/30 | vs Texas A&M100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 38-35 | 22 | 101 | 4.60 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4.4 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Tulsa | W 65-28 | 11 | 59 | 5.40 | 0 | 3 | 29 | 6.3 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Troy100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 41-38 | 28 | 157 | 5.60 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 5.2 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Washington State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 65-17 | 21 | 257 | 12.20 | 4 | 3 | -4 | 10.5 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oklahoma State
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
20072007200820082009200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 833 | 60.9 | 15.5 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 833 | 60.9 | 15.5 | 0 |
| 2008 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 1,753 | 67.5 | 33.6 | 920 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 1,753 | 67.5 | 33.6 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 465 | 42.4 | 22.9 | -1,288 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 465 | 42.4 | 22.9 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 1,649 | 55.7 | 36.7 | 1,184 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 1,649 | 55.7 | 36.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Washington State
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
253
Primary metric
253 scrimmage yards and 34.3 usage.
#2
Houston
228
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
228 scrimmage yards and 35.9 usage.
#3
Ole Miss
100
Primary metric
Loss with 100 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
100 scrimmage yards and 26.8 usage.
#4
Troy
138
Primary metric
Loss with 138 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
138 scrimmage yards and 34.5 usage.
#5
Texas
192
Primary metric
Loss with 192 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
192 scrimmage yards and 35.2 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2008 Postseason · Oklahoma State
1,753 primary output · 67.5 efficiency · 33.6 usage
68.8
#2
2008 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
68.8
1,753 primary · 67.5 efficiency · 33.6 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · Oklahoma State
65.6
1,649 primary · 55.7 efficiency · 36.7 usage
Milestones
24
100+ rush yards
8
150+ scrimmage yards
13
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
4,700
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.