Usage / Role
100%
Featured offensive role
Player Dossier
2007-2010Utah
RB • 5'11" • West Valley City, UT, USA
Matt Asiata leans balanced backfield option traits and 48.1 efficiency.
Usage / Role
100%
Featured offensive role
Impact Production
49
Developing production for a back
Reliability
70
Reliable weekly contributor
Star Power
41
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2010 Postseason · Utah
Snapshot
Player Story
Matt Asiata built his college career from 2007 through 2010 as a running back from West Valley City, UT wearing No. 4, spending time with Utah. The clearest part of Matt Asiata's career was his backfield work: 1,748...
Read the storyMatt Asiata, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2010 Postseason · Utah. Matt Asiata leans balanced backfield option traits and 48.1 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Utah | 1 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 41.9 |
| 2008 Postseason | Utah | 13 | 29 | 29 | 0 | 1 | 66.6 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Utah | 13 | 789 | 678 | 111 | 14 | 66.6 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Utah | 4 | 418 | 330 | 88 | 4 | 66.7 |
| 2010 Postseason | Utah | 13 | 32 | 22 | 10 | 0 | 74.6 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Utah | 13 | 858 | 673 | 185 | 9 | 74.6 |
Related Context
Matt Asiata played RB for Utah. Across 4 tracked seasons, Matt Asiata recorded 36 passing yards, 1,748 rushing yards, and 394 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2010 with Utah.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Utah paired 890 primary output with 48.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2008 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 50.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Air Force
Win with 116 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
62.9
Efficiency
50.7
Usage
20.6
Consistency
65
Best Game by takeover score
Air Force
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 29. Michigan: 116. UNLV: 49. Utah State: 72. Air Force: 116. Weber State: 42. Oregon State: 56. Wyoming: 50. Colorado State: 41. New Mexico: 85. TCU: 13. San Diego State: 88. BYU: 61
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 13 by 23.2. Michigan: 14 by 71.5. UNLV: 12 by 36.3. Utah State: 14 by 53.2. Air Force: 19 by 63.6. Weber State: 11 by 39. Oregon State: 8 by 76.5. Wyoming: 12 by 38.4. Colorado State: 8 by 53.4. New Mexico: 12 by 73.8. TCU: 7 by 27.5. San Diego State: 15 by 61.5. BYU: 14 by 40.9
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Air Force
Best efficiency game
76.5 vs Oregon State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/3 | @ Alabama | W 31-17 | 13 | 29 | 2.20 | 1 | — | — | 2.2 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs BYU | W 48-24 | 11 | 40 | 3.60 | 1 | 3 | 21 | 4.4 |
| Sun 11/16 | @ San Diego State | W 63-14 | 14 | 83 | 5.90 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5.9 |
| Fri 11/7 | vs TCU | W 13-10 | 6 | 19 | 3.20 | 0 | 1 | -6 | 1.9 |
| Sun 11/2 | @ New Mexico | W 13-10 | 12 | 85 | 7.10 | 0 | — | — | 7.1 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Colorado State2+ TD | W 49-16 | 8 | 41 | 5.10 | 2 | — | — | 5.1 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Wyoming2+ TD | W 40-7 | 11 | 37 | 3.40 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 4.2 |
| Fri 10/3 | vs Oregon State | W 31-28 | 7 | 53 | 7.60 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| Sun 9/28 | vs Weber State2+ TD | W 37-21 | 10 | 37 | 3.70 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 3.8 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Air Force100 rush yards | W 30-23 | 19 | 116 | 6.10 | 0 | — | — | 6.1 |
| Sun 9/14 | @ Utah State2+ TD | W 58-10 | 11 | 56 | 5.10 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 5.1 |
| Sun 9/7 | vs UNLV | W 42-21 | 11 | 34 | 3.10 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 4.1 |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Michigan | W 25-23 | 13 | 77 | 5.90 | 0 | 1 | 39 | 8.3 |
Player Story
Matt Asiata built his college career from 2007 through 2010 as a running back from West Valley City, UT wearing No. 4, spending time with Utah. The clearest part of Matt Asiata's career was his backfield work: 1,748 rushing yards, 379 carries, 24 rushing touchdowns, and 394 receiving yards across 31 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2008 with Utah. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 36 passing yards and 394 receiving yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 31 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Utah.
The arc is straightforward: Matt Asiata moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Utah
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Utah | 16 | 41.7 | 8.5 | — |
| 2008 Postseason | Utah | 818 | 50.7 | 20.6 | 802 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Utah | 818 | 50.7 | 20.6 | 0 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Utah | 418 | 56.3 | 33.9 | -400 |
| 2010 Postseason | Utah | 890 | 48.1 | 27.6 | 472 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Utah | 890 | 48.1 | 27.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
@ Wyoming
Week 7 · W 30-6 · Conference game
Win with 121 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
121
Scrimmage Yards
87.4 takeover
121 scrimmage yards and 31.5 usage.
#2
@ San Diego State
Week 12 · W 38-34 · Conference game
119
Scrimmage Yards
83.2 takeover
Win with 119 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
119 scrimmage yards and 41.5 usage.
#3
@ Air Force
Week 4 · W 30-23 · Conference game
116
Scrimmage Yards
82 takeover
Win with 116 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
116 scrimmage yards and 28.8 usage.
#4
vs Utah State
Week 1 · W 35-17
173
Scrimmage Yards
82 takeover
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
173 scrimmage yards and 55.1 usage.
#5
@ Michigan
Week 1 · W 25-23
116
Scrimmage Yards
78 takeover
Win with 116 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
116 scrimmage yards and 21.9 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2010 Postseason · Utah
890 primary output · 48.1 efficiency · 27.6 usage
74.6
#2
2010 Regular Season · Utah
74.6
890 primary · 48.1 efficiency · 27.6 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Utah
66.7
418 primary · 56.3 efficiency · 33.9 usage
3
100+ rush yards
1
150+ scrimmage yards
6
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.