Usage / Role
8%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2007-2012Boise State
RB • 5'9" • Cypress, TX, USA
D.J. Harper leans workhorse runner traits and 51.9 efficiency.
Usage / Role
8%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
37
Developing production for a back
Reliability
70
Reliable weekly contributor
Star Power
36
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2012 Postseason · Boise State
Snapshot
Player Story
D.J. Harper built his college career from 2007 through 2012 as a running back from Cypress, TX wearing No. 7, spending time with Boise State. The clearest part of D.J. Harper's career was his backfield work: 2,779...
Read the storyD.J. Harper, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2012 Postseason · Boise State. D.J. Harper leans workhorse runner traits and 51.9 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Postseason | Boise State | 10 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 38.4 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Boise State | 10 | 386 | 373 | 13 | 5 | 38.4 |
| 2008 Postseason | Boise State | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 31.8 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Boise State | 12 | 296 | 259 | 37 | 4 | 31.8 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Boise State | 3 | 291 | 284 | 7 | 3 | 65.4 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Boise State | 3 | 196 | 160 | 36 | 2 | 50.1 |
| 2011 Postseason | Boise State | 12 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 1 | 53.2 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Boise State | 12 | 696 | 553 | 143 | 9 | 53.2 |
| 2012 Postseason | Boise State | 13 | 86 | 72 | 14 | 0 | 81.6 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Boise State | 13 | 1,214 | 1,065 | 149 | 16 | 81.6 |
Related Context
D.J. Harper played RB for Boise State. Across 6 tracked seasons, D.J. Harper recorded 2,779 rushing yards, 396 receiving yards, and 41 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Boise State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Boise State paired 1,300 primary output with 51.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 49.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: TCU
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
58.1
Efficiency
49.6
Usage
17.7
Consistency
58.9
Best Game by takeover score
TCU
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona State: 1. Georgia: 44. Toledo: 48. Tulsa: 43. Nevada: 57. Fresno State: 26. Colorado State: 63. Air Force: 28. UNLV: 119. TCU: 135. Wyoming: 86. New Mexico: 47
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona State: 2 by 27.1. Georgia: 9 by 54.7. Toledo: 9 by 53.5. Tulsa: 15 by 29.9. Nevada: 12 by 40.2. Fresno State: 8 by 31.3. Colorado State: 8 by 82. Air Force: 5 by 51.5. UNLV: 15 by 83.1. TCU: 26 by 54.2. Wyoming: 14 by 49.9. New Mexico: 11 by 37.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
TCU
Best efficiency game
83.1 vs UNLV
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/23 | vs Arizona State | W 56-24 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | -3 | 0.5 |
| Sat 12/3 | vs New Mexico | W 45-0 | 9 | 28 | 3.10 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 4.3 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Wyoming | W 36-14 | 9 | 35 | 3.90 | 0 | 5 | 51 | 6.1 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs TCU100 rush yards · 2+ TD | L 35-36 | 24 | 125 | 5.20 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 5.2 |
| Sun 11/6 | @ UNLV100 rush yards | W 48-21 | 13 | 109 | 8.40 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 7.9 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Air Force | W 37-26 | 4 | 18 | 4.50 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 5.6 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Colorado State2+ TD | W 63-13 | 8 | 63 | 7.90 | 2 | — | — | 7.9 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Fresno State2+ TD | W 57-7 | 6 | 17 | 2.80 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 3.3 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Nevada | W 30-10 | 11 | 36 | 3.30 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 4.8 |
| Sun 9/25 | vs Tulsa | W 41-21 | 15 | 43 | 2.90 | 0 | — | — | 2.9 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Toledo | W 40-15 | 7 | 35 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 5.3 |
| Sun 9/4 | @ Georgia | W 35-21 | 8 | 44 | 5.50 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4.9 |
Player Story
D.J. Harper built his college career from 2007 through 2012 as a running back from Cypress, TX wearing No. 7, spending time with Boise State. The clearest part of D.J. Harper's career was his backfield work: 2,779 rushing yards, 547 carries, 39 rushing touchdowns, and 396 receiving yards across 53 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2012 with Boise State. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 396 receiving yards and 238 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 53 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Boise State.
The arc is straightforward: D.J. Harper moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Boise State
2007-2012
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Postseason | Boise State | 389 | 38.5 | 14.2 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Boise State | 389 | 38.5 | 14.2 | 0 |
| 2008 Postseason | Boise State | 302 | 45.7 | 8.7 | -87 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Boise State | 302 | 45.7 | 8.7 | 0 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Boise State | 291 | 68.7 | 27.1 | -11 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Boise State | 196 | 78.2 | 12 | -95 |
| 2011 Postseason | Boise State | 697 | 49.6 | 17.7 | 501 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Boise State | 697 | 49.6 | 17.7 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Boise State | 1,300 | 51.9 | 35.1 | 603 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Boise State | 1,300 | 51.9 | 35.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
@ Fresno State
Week 9 · W 34-21 · Conference game
Win with 150 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
150
Scrimmage Yards
91.7 takeover
150 scrimmage yards and 32.8 usage.
#2
@ Fresno State
Week 3 · W 51-34 · Conference game
114
Scrimmage Yards
89.1 takeover
Win with 114 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
114 scrimmage yards and 28.3 usage.
#3
vs Miami (OH)
Week 3 · W 39-12
183
Scrimmage Yards
88.4 takeover
Win with 183 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
183 scrimmage yards and 24.6 usage.
#4
vs TCU
Week 11 · L 35-36 · Conference game
135
Scrimmage Yards
84.7 takeover
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
135 scrimmage yards and 43.3 usage.
#5
@ UNLV
Week 10 · W 48-21 · Conference game
119
Scrimmage Yards
83.1 takeover
Win with 119 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
119 scrimmage yards and 27.3 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2012 Postseason · Boise State
1,300 primary output · 51.9 efficiency · 35.1 usage
81.6
#2
2012 Regular Season · Boise State
81.6
1,300 primary · 51.9 efficiency · 35.1 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Boise State
65.4
291 primary · 68.7 efficiency · 27.1 usage
10
100+ rush yards
2
150+ scrimmage yards
10
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.