Usage Score
25.3
Player Dossier
2007-2010LSU
WR • 6'5" • Hempstead, TX, USA
Terrence Toliver reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
25.3
Efficiency
80.9
Consistency
52.3
Season Value
61.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · LSU
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Terrence Toliver, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · LSU. Terrence Toliver reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Terrence Toliver played WR for LSU. Across 4 tracked seasons, Terrence Toliver recorded 36 rushing yards, 1,820 receiving yards, and 12 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2009 with LSU.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
LSU paired 735 primary output with 80.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 80.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
44.5
Efficiency
80.9
Usage
25.3
Consistency
52.3
Best Game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 112. North Carolina: 17. Vanderbilt: 30. Mississippi State: 35. West Virginia: 14. Tennessee: 52. Florida: 111. Unknown: 27. Auburn: 25. Alabama: 42. UL Monroe: 42. Ole Miss: 31. Arkansas: 41
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 5 by 100. North Carolina: 3 by 37.8. Vanderbilt: 3 by 66.7. Mississippi State: 3 by 77.8. West Virginia: 2 by 46.7. Tennessee: 3 by 100. Florida: 6 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 90. Auburn: 3 by 55.6. Alabama: 3 by 93.3. UL Monroe: 3 by 93.3. Ole Miss: 2 by 100. Arkansas: 3 by 91.1
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Best efficiency game
100 vs Texas A&M
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/8 | @ Texas A&M100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 41-24 | — | 5 | 112 | 22.4 | 22.40 | 3 | 42 |
| Sat 11/27 | @ Arkansas | L 23-31 | — | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Ole Miss | W 43-36 | — | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 11/14 | vs UL Monroe | W 51-0 | — | 3 | 42 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Alabama | W 24-21 | — | 3 | 42 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Auburn | L 17-24 | — | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Florida100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 33-29 | — | 6 | 111 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 2 | 38 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Tennessee | W 16-14 | — | 3 | 52 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 0 | 21 |
| Sun 9/26 | vs West Virginia | W 20-14 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Mississippi State | W 29-7 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Vanderbilt | W 27-3 | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 9/5 | @ North Carolina | W 30-24 | — | 3 | 17 | 5.7 | 5.70 | 0 | 7 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
LSU
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | LSU | 249 | 90.9 | 7.7 | — |
| 2008 Postseason | LSU | 257 | 77.6 | 15 | 8 |
| 2008 Regular Season | LSU | 257 | 77.6 | 15 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | LSU | 735 | 80.2 | 30.6 | 478 |
| 2009 Regular Season | LSU | 735 | 80.2 | 30.6 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | LSU | 579 | 80.9 | 25.3 | -156 |
| 2010 Regular Season | LSU | 579 | 80.9 | 25.3 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Texas A&M
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
112
Primary metric
112 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Florida
111
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
111 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Washington
117
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
117 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Louisiana Tech
119
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
119 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Ole Miss
107
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
107 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · LSU
735 primary output · 80.2 efficiency · 30.6 usage
71.6
#2
2009 Regular Season · LSU
71.6
735 primary · 80.2 efficiency · 30.6 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · LSU
61.6
579 primary · 80.9 efficiency · 25.3 usage
5
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2007 · Rating 0.9965
Hempstead · Hempstead, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,820
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.