Usage Score
10.3
Player Dossier
2007-2011Oklahoma
WR • 6'2" • Lowell, MI, USA
Keith Nichol reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
10.3
Efficiency
75.4
Consistency
64.1
Season Value
47.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season · Oklahoma
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Keith Nichol, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season · Oklahoma. Keith Nichol reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season
Oklahoma paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 75.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Oklahoma, Michigan State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
29.3
Efficiency
75.4
Usage
10.3
Consistency
64.1
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia: 53. Unknown: 14. Florida Atlantic: 40. Notre Dame: 9. Central Michigan: 54. Ohio State: 21. Michigan: 20. Wisconsin: 44. Minnesota: 41. Iowa: 13. Indiana: 4. Wisconsin: 39
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia: 4 by 88.3. Unknown: 1 by 93.3. Florida Atlantic: 2 by 100. Notre Dame: 1 by 60. Central Michigan: 3 by 100. Ohio State: 2 by 70. Michigan: 2 by 66.7. Wisconsin: 1 by 100. Minnesota: 3 by 91.1. Iowa: 2 by 43.3. Indiana: 1 by 26.7. Wisconsin: 4 by 65
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Wisconsin
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/2 | @ Georgia | W 33-30 | — | 4 | 53 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 1 | 25 |
| Sun 12/4 | vs Wisconsin | L 39-42 | — | 4 | 39 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Indiana | W 55-3 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Iowa | W 37-21 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Minnesota | W 31-24 | — | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 1 | 31 |
| Sun 10/23 | vs Wisconsin | W 37-31 | — | 1 | 44 | 44 | 44 | 1 | 44 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Michigan | W 28-14 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Ohio State | W 10-7 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Central Michigan | W 45-7 | — | 3 | 54 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Notre Dame | L 13-31 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 44-0 | — | 2 | 40 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 30 |
| Fri 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Oklahoma
2007
Opening stop
Michigan State
2009-2011
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2009 Postseason | Michigan State | 11 | 36.7 | 12.5 | 11 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Michigan State | 11 | 36.7 | 12.5 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Michigan State | 262 | 64.5 | 10.4 | 251 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Michigan State | 262 | 64.5 | 10.4 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Michigan State | 352 | 75.4 | 10.3 | 90 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Michigan State | 352 | 75.4 | 10.3 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Central Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
54
Primary metric
54 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Georgia
53
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
53 receiving yards with a 88.3 efficiency score.
#3
Northwestern
51
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 85 efficiency score.
#4
Michigan
42
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Wisconsin
44
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2007 Regular Season · Oklahoma
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2011 Postseason · Michigan State
47.3
352 primary · 75.4 efficiency · 10.3 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Michigan State
47.3
352 primary · 75.4 efficiency · 10.3 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
625
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Keith Nichol quick answers