Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2004-2004Oklahoma
—
Jason White shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
71.5
Season Value
85.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season · Oklahoma
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jason White, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season · Oklahoma. Jason White shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season
Oklahoma paired 35 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2004 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
2.7
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
71.5
Best Game by takeover score
USC
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. USC: 2. Bowling Green: 3. Houston: 2. Oregon: 1. Texas Tech: 3. Texas: 0. Kansas State: 4. Kansas: 4. Oklahoma State: 3. Texas A&M: 5. Nebraska: 3. Baylor: 2. Colorado: 3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Best efficiency game
— vs USC
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/5 | vs USC | L 19-55 | 24 | 36 | 244 | 66.7 | 2 | 3 | — | 3 | -8 | -2.70 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 12/5 | vs Colorado | W 42-3 | 22 | 29 | 254 | 75.9 | 3 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Baylor | W 35-0 | 19 | 32 | 194 | 59.4 | 2 | 0 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sun 11/14 | vs Nebraska | W 30-3 | 29 | 35 | 383 | 82.9 | 3 | 0 | — | 2 | -8 | -4 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Texas A&M | W 42-35 | 19 | 35 | 292 | 54.3 | 5 | 0 | — | 1 | -11 | -11 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Oklahoma State | W 38-35 | 14 | 26 | 221 | 53.8 | 3 | 0 | — | 2 | -7 | -3.50 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Kansas | W 41-10 | 27 | 44 | 389 | 61.4 | 4 | 0 | — | 2 | -18 | -9 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Kansas State | W 31-21 | 20 | 31 | 256 | 64.5 | 4 | 1 | — | 1 | -2 | -2 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Texas | W 12-0 | 14 | 26 | 113 | 53.8 | 0 | 2 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Texas Tech | W 28-13 | 15 | 24 | 151 | 62.5 | 3 | 0 | — | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Oregon | W 31-7 | 17 | 23 | 213 | 73.9 | 1 | 0 | — | 5 | -31 | -6.20 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Houston | W 63-13 | 14 | 18 | 257 | 77.8 | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Bowling Green | W 40-24 | 21 | 31 | 238 | 67.7 | 3 | 1 | — | 2 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Oklahoma
2004
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 35 | — | — | — |
#1 Featured game
Texas A&M
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
5
Primary metric
5 primary-metric impact.
#2
Kansas
4
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
4 primary-metric impact.
#3
Kansas State
4
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
4 primary-metric impact.
#4
Colorado
3
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
3 primary-metric impact.
#5
Nebraska
3
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
3 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2004 Regular Season · Oklahoma
35 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
85.8
8
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2015 · Rating 0.8174
Enterprise · Redding, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
1
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 1 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Jason White quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit