Usage Score
9.5
Player Profile
QB • 6'4" • Austin, TX, USA
Steven Sheffield is a balanced quarterback profile with 9.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
9.5
Efficiency
45.2
Consistency
34.2
Season Value
30.7
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Texas Tech
Quick Facts
Steven Sheffield, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Texas Tech. Steven Sheffield is a balanced quarterback profile with 9.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Texas Tech paired 1,178 primary output with 64.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 45.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2010 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Loss with 133 yards of offense and 59.2 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Primary Metric / G
53.6
Efficiency
45.2
Usage
9.5
Consistency
34.2
Best Game by takeover score
Unknown
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. New Mexico: 32. Texas: -8. Iowa State: 2. Texas A&M: 133. Missouri: 102. Oklahoma: 5. Unknown: 109
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Mexico: 9 by 56. Texas: 3 by 25. Iowa State: 1 by 20. Texas A&M: 18 by 59.2. Missouri: 26 by 50.3. Oklahoma: 4 by 45.1. Unknown: 15 by 60.6
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Best efficiency game
60.6 vs Unknown
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/20 | vs Unknown | — | 8 | 12 | 109 | 66.7 | 1 | 0 | 60.6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/13 | @ Oklahoma | L 7-45 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 25.0 | 0 | 0 | 45.1 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 11/7 | vs Missouri | W 24-17 | 11 | 20 | 99 | 55.0 | 0 | 0 | 50.3 | 6 | 3 | 0.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Texas A&M | L 27-45 | 11 | 14 | 129 | 78.6 | 2 | 1 | 59.2 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Iowa State | L 38-52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Sun 9/19 | vs Texas | L 14-24 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 2 | -8 | -4 | 0 | 5 |
| Sun 9/12 | @ New Mexico | W 52-17 | 2 | 7 | 17 | 28.6 | 0 | 0 | 56 | 2 | 15 | 7.50 | 1 | 10 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas Tech
2009-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Texas Tech | 1,178 | 64.5 | 16.7 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 1,178 | 64.5 | 16.7 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 375 | 45.2 | 9.5 | -803 |
#1 Featured game
Kansas State
Win with 509 yards of offense and 83.4 efficiency.
509
Primary metric
509 total offense with 83.4 efficiency.
#2
Texas A&M
133
Primary metric
Loss with 133 yards of offense and 59.2 efficiency.
133 total offense with 59.2 efficiency.
#3
Unknown
109
Primary metric
Game with 109 yards of offense and 60.6 efficiency.
109 total offense with 60.6 efficiency.
#4
Nebraska
202
Primary metric
Win with 202 yards of offense and 58.2 efficiency.
202 total offense with 58.2 efficiency.
#5
Missouri
102
Primary metric
Win with 102 yards of offense and 50.3 efficiency.
102 total offense with 50.3 efficiency.
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · Texas Tech
1,178 primary output · 64.5 efficiency · 16.7 usage
57.6
#2
2009 Regular Season · Texas Tech
57.6
1,178 primary · 64.5 efficiency · 16.7 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Texas Tech
30.7
375 primary · 45.2 efficiency · 9.5 usage
1
250+ passing yards
1
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
4
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
1,553
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.
Steven Sheffield quick answers