Usage Score
20.5
Player Dossier
2007-2009Alabama
Mike McCoy
WR • 6'3" • Rankin, MS, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Mike McCoy reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
73.7
Consistency
44.9
Season Value
52.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Alabama
070809
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Alabama
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Florida International
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mike McCoy, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Alabama. Mike McCoy reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season
Alabama paired 191 primary output with 77.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 73.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2009 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida International
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · Alabama
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
49.7
Efficiency
73.7
Usage
20.5
Consistency
44.9
Best Game by takeover score
Unknown
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida International: 100. North Texas: 38. Unknown: 11
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida International: 5 by 100. North Texas: 3 by 84.4. Unknown: 2 by 36.7
Split Comparison
Wins69 · n=2
First Half69 · n=2
All Games49.7 · n=3
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida International
Best efficiency game
100 vs Florida International
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Alabama
2007-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
200720082009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Alabama | 207 | 51.1 | 12.8 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Alabama | 191 | 77.8 | 13.8 | -16 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Alabama | 149 | 73.7 | 20.5 | -42 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Florida International
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
100
Primary metric
100 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Ole Miss
45
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Western Kentucky
42
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#4
Georgia
47
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
47 receiving yards with a 52.2 efficiency score.
#5
Clemson
33
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2008 Regular Season · Alabama
191 primary output · 77.8 efficiency · 13.8 usage
64.1
#2
2007 Regular Season · Alabama
54.3
207 primary · 51.1 efficiency · 12.8 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Alabama
52.6
149 primary · 73.7 efficiency · 20.5 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
547
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.