Usage Score
14.2
Player Dossier
2007-2010Florida Atlantic
Jeff Van Camp
QB • 6'6" • Gulf Breeze, FL, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Jeff Van Camp is a balanced quarterback profile with 14.2 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
51.2
Consistency
81.1
Season Value
61.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Florida Atlantic
07080910
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Florida Atlantic
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jeff Van Camp, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Florida Atlantic. Jeff Van Camp is a balanced quarterback profile with 14.2 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Florida Atlantic paired 2,266 primary output with 51.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 51.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2010 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Troy
Loss with 287 yards of offense and 50.7 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Regular Season · Florida Atlantic
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
188.8
Efficiency
51.2
Usage
14.2
Consistency
81.1
Best Game by takeover score
Troy
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UAB: 247. Michigan State: 194. North Texas: 273. South Florida: 99. UL Monroe: 133. Arkansas State: 198. Florida International: 174. Western Kentucky: 141. Louisiana: 156. Texas: 209. Middle Tennessee: 155. Troy: 287
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UAB: 27 by 57.4. Michigan State: 40 by 54.2. North Texas: 34 by 56.3. South Florida: 33 by 52.7. UL Monroe: 29 by 45. Arkansas State: 33 by 47.1. Florida International: 30 by 56. Western Kentucky: 23 by 46.4. Louisiana: 23 by 61.5. Texas: 31 by 44.7. Middle Tennessee: 40 by 42.7. Troy: 48 by 50.7
Split Comparison
Wins179.5 · n=4 · -14 vs Losses
Losses193.5 · n=8 · +14 vs Wins
First Half190.7 · n=6 · +3.7 vs Second Half
Second Half187 · n=6 · -3.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Troy
Best efficiency game
61.5 vs Louisiana
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/4 | vs Troy300-yard game | L 7-44 | 21 | 41 | 302 | 51.2 | 1 | 1 | 50.7 | 7 | -15 | -2.10 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/27 | @ Middle Tennessee | L 14-38 | 20 | 35 | 201 | 57.1 | 2 | 3 | 42.7 | 5 | -46 | -9.20 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Texas | L 17-51 | 11 | 26 | 210 | 42.3 | 2 | 2 | 44.7 | 5 | -1 | -0.20 | 0 | 29 |
| Sun 11/14 | vs Louisiana3+ TD | W 24-23 | 11 | 18 | 183 | 61.1 | 3 | 0 | 61.5 | 5 | -27 | -5.40 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Western Kentucky | W 17-16 | 9 | 22 | 140 | 40.9 | 1 | 1 | 46.4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 10/30 | vs Florida International | W 21-9 | 19 | 27 | 174 | 70.4 | 1 | 0 | 56 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Arkansas State | L 16-37 | 13 | 27 | 227 | 48.1 | 2 | 2 | 47.1 | 6 | -29 | -4.80 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ UL Monroe | L 17-20 | 13 | 26 | 141 | 50.0 | 0 | 1 | 45 | 3 | -8 | -2.70 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ South Florida | L 3-31 | 17 | 22 | 136 | 77.3 | 0 | 1 | 52.7 | 11 | -37 | -3.40 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/25 | vs North Texas | L 17-21 | 20 | 31 | 273 | 64.5 | 1 | 1 | 56.3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Michigan State | L 17-30 | 23 | 35 | 215 | 65.7 | 1 | 0 | 54.2 | 5 | -21 | -4.20 | 0 | 3 |
| Fri 9/3 | @ UAB3+ TD | W 32-31 | 15 | 25 | 257 | 60.0 | 3 | 1 | 57.4 | 2 | -10 | -5 | 0 | 0 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Florida Atlantic
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
2007200820092010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Florida Atlantic | 2 | 27.5 | 5.1 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Florida Atlantic | 65 | 53 | 4.8 | 63 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Florida Atlantic | 1,391 | 62 | 14.1 | 1,326 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Florida Atlantic | 2,266 | 51.2 | 14.2 | 875 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Minnesota
Loss with 22 yards of offense and 65.6 efficiency.
22
Primary metric
22 total offense with 65.6 efficiency.
#2
Louisiana
17
Primary metric
Win with 17 yards of offense and 73.6 efficiency.
17 total offense with 73.6 efficiency.
#3
UAB
278
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
278 total offense with 58.3 efficiency.
#4
Troy
287
Primary metric
Loss with 287 yards of offense and 50.7 efficiency.
287 total offense with 50.7 efficiency.
#5
Florida International
237
Primary metric
Win with 237 yards of offense and 61.2 efficiency.
237 total offense with 61.2 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Florida Atlantic
2,266 primary output · 51.2 efficiency · 14.2 usage
61.4
#2
2009 Regular Season · Florida Atlantic
47.7
1,391 primary · 62 efficiency · 14.1 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Florida Atlantic
35.4
65 primary · 53 efficiency · 4.8 usage
Milestones
4
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
2
3+ takeover TD games
9
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
3,724
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.