Usage / Role
—
Role sample still building
Player Dossier
2006-2009Tulane
—
Andre Anderson shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage / Role
—
Role sample still building
Impact Production
—
Production sample still building
Reliability
8
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
20
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2008 Regular Season · Tulane
Snapshot
Andre Anderson, player. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2008 Regular Season · Tulane. Andre Anderson shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | TD | Primary | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Tulane | 5 | 0 | 1 | 8.9 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Tulane | 4 | 0 | 1 | 9.7 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Tulane | 7 | 0 | 8 | 73.1 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Tulane | 12 | 0 | 9 | 57 |
Related Context
Andre Anderson is listed for Tulane. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season
Tulane paired 8 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2007 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2009 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: LSU
Loss with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Primary Metric / G
0.3
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
8.3
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 1. Army: 0. UAB: 0. Tulsa: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
LSU
Best efficiency game
— vs Tulsa
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tulane
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Tulane | 1 | — | — | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Tulane | 1 | — | — | 0 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Tulane | 8 | — | — | 7 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Tulane | 9 | — | — | 1 |
#1 Featured game
vs Army
Week 9 · W 42-28
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Touchdowns
100 takeover
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
vs LSU
Week 5 · L 9-34
1
Touchdowns
100 takeover
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#3
@ UTEP
Week 7 · L 21-24 · Conference game
3
Touchdowns
100 takeover
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
3 primary-metric impact.
#4
vs McNeese
Week 4 · W 42-32
4
Touchdowns
100 takeover
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
4 primary-metric impact.
#5
vs East Carolina
Week 3 · L 24-28 · Conference game
2
Touchdowns
66.7 takeover
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by Season Value
2008 Regular Season · Tulane
8 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
73.1
#2
2009 Regular Season · Tulane
57
9 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2007 Regular Season · Tulane
9.7
1 primary · — efficiency · — usage
5
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.