Usage Score
25.7
Player Dossier
2006-2009Ole Miss
Dexter McCluster
WR • 5'9" • Largo, FL, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Dexter McCluster reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
70.3
Consistency
59
Season Value
47.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season · Ole Miss
060708080909
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Ole Miss
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dexter McCluster, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season · Ole Miss. Dexter McCluster reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season
Ole Miss paired 232 primary output with 90.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 70.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Postseason · Ole Miss
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
43.3
Efficiency
70.3
Usage
25.7
Consistency
59
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 45. Memphis: 65. Unknown: 48. South Carolina: 0. Vanderbilt: 42. Alabama: 22. UAB: 21. Arkansas: 137. Auburn: 17. Tennessee: 42. LSU: 18. Mississippi State: 63
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 5 by 60. Memphis: 6 by 72.2. Unknown: 3 by 100. Vanderbilt: 2 by 100. Alabama: 3 by 48.9. UAB: 2 by 70. Arkansas: 7 by 100. Auburn: 4 by 28.3. Tennessee: 4 by 70. LSU: 3 by 40. Mississippi State: 5 by 84
Split Comparison
Wins52.9 · n=7 · +27.4 vs Losses
Losses25.5 · n=4 · -27.4 vs Wins
First Half37 · n=6 · -12.7 vs Second Half
Second Half49.7 · n=6 · +12.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arkansas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/2 | vs Oklahoma State | W 21-7 | — | 5 | 45 | 5.9 | 9 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/28 | @ Mississippi State | L 27-41 | — | 5 | 63 | 6.9 | 12.60 | 1 | 52 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs LSU | W 25-23 | — | 3 | 18 | 6.1 | 6 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs Tennessee | W 42-17 | — | 4 | 42 | 11.2 | 10.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Auburn | L 20-33 | — | 4 | 17 | 7.8 | 4.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Arkansas100 receiving yards | W 30-17 | — | 7 | 137 | 9.0 | 19.60 | 1 | 64 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs UAB | W 48-13 | — | 2 | 21 | 7.3 | 10.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Alabama | L 3-22 | — | 3 | 22 | 4.1 | 7.30 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Vanderbilt | W 23-7 | — | 2 | 42 | 6.1 | 21 | 0 | 24 |
| Thu 9/24 | @ South Carolina | L 10-16 | — | — | — | 5.7 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 48 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 35 |
| Sun 9/6 | @ Memphis | W 45-14 | — | 6 | 65 | 7.7 | 10.80 | 1 | 17 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ole Miss
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
200620072008200820092009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 232 | 90.6 | 36.6 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 326 | 75 | 21.4 | 94 |
| 2008 Postseason | Ole Miss | 625 | 80.5 | 24.6 | 299 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 625 | 80.5 | 24.6 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Ole Miss | 520 | 70.3 | 25.7 | -105 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 520 | 70.3 | 25.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Memphis
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
86
Primary metric
86 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
#2
Vanderbilt
132
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
132 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Arkansas
137
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
137 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
LSU
73
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
73 receiving yards with a 97.3 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
57
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2006 Regular Season · Ole Miss
232 primary output · 90.6 efficiency · 36.6 usage
52.2
#2
2008 Postseason · Ole Miss
49
625 primary · 80.5 efficiency · 24.6 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Ole Miss
49
625 primary · 80.5 efficiency · 24.6 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.8004
Chaminade College Prep · St. Louis, MO
- Committed To
- Ball State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,703
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.