Usage Score
33.2
Player Dossier
2006-2009Ole Miss
Shay Hodge
WR • 6'2" • Morton, MS, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Shay Hodge reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
93
Consistency
76.8
Season Value
75.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Ole Miss
060708080909
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Ole Miss
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Shay Hodge, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Ole Miss. Shay Hodge reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Ole Miss paired 1,135 primary output with 93 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 93 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Postseason · Ole Miss
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
87.3
Efficiency
93
Usage
33.2
Consistency
76.8
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 112. Memphis: 77. Unknown: 59. South Carolina: 11. Vanderbilt: 122. Alabama: 21. UAB: 99. Arkansas: 70. Auburn: 105. Unknown: 169. Tennessee: 77. LSU: 117. Mississippi State: 96
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 7 by 100. Memphis: 3 by 100. Unknown: 5 by 78.7. South Carolina: 1 by 73.3. Vanderbilt: 8 by 100. Alabama: 2 by 70. UAB: 7 by 94.3. Arkansas: 5 by 93.3. Auburn: 7 by 100. Unknown: 7 by 100. Tennessee: 5 by 100. LSU: 7 by 100. Mississippi State: 6 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins96.3 · n=7 · +38.0 vs Losses
Losses58.3 · n=4 · -38.0 vs Wins
First Half71.6 · n=7 · -34.1 vs Second Half
Second Half105.7 · n=6 · +34.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Oklahoma State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/2 | vs Oklahoma State100 receiving yards | W 21-7 | — | 7 | 112 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 11/28 | @ Mississippi State | L 27-41 | — | 6 | 96 | 16 | 16 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs LSU100 receiving yards | W 25-23 | — | 7 | 117 | 16.7 | 16.70 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs Tennessee | W 42-17 | — | 5 | 77 | 15.4 | 15.40 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 11/8 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | — | — | 7 | 169 | 24.1 | 24.10 | 2 | 65 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Auburn100 receiving yards | L 20-33 | — | 7 | 105 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 43 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Arkansas | W 30-17 | — | 5 | 70 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs UAB | W 48-13 | — | 7 | 99 | 14.1 | 14.10 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Alabama | L 3-22 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Vanderbilt100 receiving yards · High volume | W 23-7 | — | 8 | 122 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 2 | 48 |
| Thu 9/24 | @ South Carolina | L 10-16 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 59 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 1 | 20 |
| Sun 9/6 | @ Memphis | W 45-14 | — | 3 | 77 | 25.7 | 25.70 | 0 | 33 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ole Miss
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
200620072008200820092009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 193 | 82.1 | 16.6 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 593 | 84.2 | 22 | 400 |
| 2008 Postseason | Ole Miss | 725 | 85.1 | 24.2 | 132 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 725 | 85.1 | 24.2 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Ole Miss | 1,135 | 93 | 33.2 | 410 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 1,135 | 93 | 33.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
169
Primary metric
169 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
88
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Florida
133
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
133 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
LSU
90
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
LSU
117
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
117 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · Ole Miss
1,135 primary output · 93 efficiency · 33.2 usage
75.8
#2
2009 Regular Season · Ole Miss
75.8
1,135 primary · 93 efficiency · 33.2 usage
#3
2008 Postseason · Ole Miss
61.7
725 primary · 85.1 efficiency · 24.2 usage
Milestones
6
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.8067
Toms River North · Toms River, NJ
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,646
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 44 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.