Usage / Role
1%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2008-2009Rutgers
WR • 6'1" • Malverne, NY, USA
Julian Hayes reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
1%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
9
Developing production for a receiver
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
16
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2009 Regular Season · Rutgers
Snapshot
Julian Hayes, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2009 Regular Season · Rutgers. Julian Hayes reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Rutgers | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 47 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Rutgers | 4 | 6 | 65 | 0 | 63.9 |
Related Context
Julian Hayes played WR for Rutgers. Across 2 tracked seasons, Julian Hayes recorded 74 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Rutgers.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
Rutgers paired 65 primary output with 65 efficiency.
Supporting note
2008 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 60 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2009 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Army
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
1
Receiving Yards / G
9
Efficiency
60
Usage
4.3
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Army
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
1 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Army
Best efficiency game
60 vs Army
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/22 | vs Army | W 30-3 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Rutgers
2008-2009
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Rutgers | 9 | 60 | 4.3 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Rutgers | 65 | 65 | 8.3 | 56 |
#1 Featured game
vs Texas Southern
Week 6 · W 42-0
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
25
Receiving Yards
73.4 takeover
25 receiving yards with a 83.3 efficiency score.
#2
vs Pittsburgh
Week 7 · L 17-24 · Conference game
27
Receiving Yards
73 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
#3
vs Army
Week 13 · W 30-3
9
Receiving Yards
58.1 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#4
vs Cincinnati
Week 1 · L 15-47 · Conference game
9
Receiving Yards
35.9 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#5
vs South Florida
Week 11 · W 31-0 · Conference game
4
Receiving Yards
21.3 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
4 receiving yards with a 26.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2009 Regular Season · Rutgers
65 primary output · 65 efficiency · 8.3 usage
63.9
#2
2008 Regular Season · Rutgers
47
9 primary · 60 efficiency · 4.3 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.